Tag Archives: Antifa

Ann Coulter Hits Home Run on Kyle Rittenhouse Trial

In a superb column (her second in two weeks), Ann Coulter gave a journalistic middle finger to the Fake News Media, race hustlers, and riot revelers who have descended on Kenosha, WI, to attack Kyle Rittenhouse, law and order, the second amendment, and civilization itself.

The Left, bent on the total transformation of America into a progressive utopia, is using every corrupt thing it can muster to aid its cause, from Soviet-style show trials to Pravda-like propaganda to threats, intimidation, doxxing, and mob rule.

Enter Ann Coulter, with a game-changing grand-slam home run in her column (11/17/21), in which she wrote that the prosecutor charged Rittenhouse …

“for shooting three psychopathic criminals who were attacking him at the BLM/antifa riots in Kenosha last year.”

Coulter added:

“In his closing argument, Binger decided to ignore his loser case and argue an entirely different case, for which no evidence had been adduced.”

“according to Binger, the collection of mental patients, domestic violence offenders and pedophiles attacking Rittenhouse were ‘heroes,’ just trying to stop the ‘active shooter’!”

While demonizing Rittenhouse, Binger lionized the depraved:

“But it’s pretty sleazy for a prosecutor to rely on the jurors’ ignorance of excluded evidence to paint a picture he knows to be false of the men who attacked the defendant and their pure-as-snow motives.”

“This is the prosecutor calling stranglers, burglars and elderly abusers ‘heroes’!”

“The only monster in this sea of angels, according to Binger, was Rittenhouse.”

Coulter’s conclusion is spot on!

“Kyle Rittenhouse is on trial so that no one will dare stand in the way of the left’s shock troops ever again.”

For more of Coulter’s best, see @AnnCoulter at Her Best at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-pM.

@AnnCoulter Ends 2019 with Putrid Polemic

Although Ann Coulter wrote some powerful and praiseworthy columns in 2019, she ended the year publishing a putrid polemic, thus exposing her dark heart.

It was ugly!

While denouncing the evils of Hollywood’s portrayal of America, Coulter’s column was, in large measure – evil.

Much of what Coulter wrote about Hollywood scripts was accurate, but, she went out of her way to lambaste a particular person – Celine Robinson – vilifying both her ideology and her looks, and treating her as representative of all lesbians, Jews, and feminists.

What prompted this column by Coulter? Robinson had enraged Coulter with this tweet:

Coulter, creatively, in paragraph after paragraph, made it clear that in her eyes, this “half French, queer, Jewish feminist” is ugly and the antithesis of the “hot actors and actresses” who play the characters in her scripts. (Coulter was uncharitable, to say the least!)

Indeed, these hot actresses are “the molecular opposite of” Robinson and Robinson’s photo alone is proof that it is “Opposites Day” every day in Hollywood. (Coulter adroitly included a link to a tweet from 2016 which contained a photo of her nemesis and victim.)

Coulter used the phrase “queer, Jewish feminist” five times, notably dismissing as inconsequential the “half French” portion of Robinson’s personal self-identity. (I gather that Freedom Fries have long passed their expiration date.)

The bulk of the remainder of Coulter’s column was devoted to Third World sodomy and pedophilia, in graphic terms. She seemed to delight in being outrageous.

(Coulter is known for being somewhat tardy at speaking engagements and in posting her columns. On this occasion, she posted this column one day early, as if she couldn’t wait for others to see it.)

In the early weeks of 2020, Coulter continued with her attacks on the looks of those with whom she disagrees. Looksism is extremely important to her: She wants to be perceived as beautiful and hot while denigrating her foes as being not.

Here’s one example:

Here are a few responses:

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged provides an in-depth, detailed analysis of Coulter’s worldview and character flaws which have led her to be so wrong in so many areas in which she regards herself as an expert.