Tag Archives: impeachment

Coulter’s America (belongs uniquely to Ann)

Ann Coulter’s column this week confirms what I have been saying for years: Coulter believes America belongs to her!

Hence her being the authority on who a real American is.

Hence her dismissal of 13 heroic Americans who died in Kabul (they weren’t WASP enough).[1]

Hence her obsession with immigration and blindness to the chaos of the Biden administration (which she blames on Trump).

Here’s necessary context for Coulter’s column. Because the world revolves around Coulter,[2] the American Identity revolves around Coulter’s family.[3]

Coulter demands sole control over America’s identity[4] and role in the world.[5]

Coulter’s views on race, immigration, and foreign policy must be strictly adhered to or you will be denounced as a traitor. Trump’s failure – in her eyes – to pursue her agenda for America First fostered her hatred for Trump.[6]

So much so that Coulter trashed Trump despite Trump’s triumphs for peace and prosperity,[7] even going so far as to demand his second impeachment for yet another hoax and witch hunt.[8]

Coulter’s Narcissistic Column

Coulter began her column, writing:

My ancestors were Presbyterian abolitionists who fought on the Union side, but I get really ticked off when imbeciles take a sledgehammer to my country’s history.”

Coulter lauds her perfect WASP ancestors fighting against slavery, calling it “my country’s history.”[9] (Ironically, her ancestors also owned slaves.)

Coulter continued, defending Robert E. Lee:

“Never has a civil war ended with such love between the former enemies. That’s our history, our country, our war — North and South, black and white.”

Coulter then segued to bashing immigrants and blaming them for the carnage (without citing any evidence):

“No, the moving force behind this frenzied destruction of American history isn’t black people suddenly offended by monuments that have been around for a century; it’s pushy newcomers, bitter that their ancestors had nothing to do with the creation of this country. After other people’s ancestors carved a nation out of the wilderness, they just kind of showed up. Now they go around obliterating anything that reminds them that this country was up and running long before they got here.”

Are these so-called “pushy newcomers” really the ones trashing America? Where’s her proof?

Coulter again defended the Confederacy while undercutting her own argument:

“America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, titles its report on Confederate symbols ‘Whose Heritage? Public Symbols of the Confederacy.’ Yes, exactly, it’s not their heritage, so it must be destroyed. My ancestors fought on the Union side, but they were involved, and it matters to me.”

Coulter again confuses the Confederacy with the United States, even though she repeatedly tells us her ancestors fought for the Union.[10]

“MSNBC’s smirking Chris Hayes can get weepy about some ancient Roman ruin, and Rachel Maddow about a building in Warsaw, but I care about my history. These savages are smashing and graffitiing my antiquities.”

Coulter is rightly upset over cultural Marxism and the toppling of statues and monuments by people whom she calls “savages.” Are Confederate statues and monuments really Ann’s “history” and her “antiquities”?[11]

To further understand Coulter’s worldview, see Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

Endnotes:


[1]              See Ann Coulter: “Let Them All Die” at https://bit.ly/3kmDIYH.

[2]              See Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory at http://bit.ly/1M2z2O5.

[3]              See Case Study: Settler in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[4]              See Case Study: WASP America in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[5]              See Case Study: From Jingoist to Pacifist in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[6]              See Case Study: #WackyNutJob in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[7]              See Apocalyptic @AnnCoulter Screams Doomsday in Midst of American Renaissance at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-pa.

[8]              See Crazy @AnnCoulter Demands Trump Conviction for Wall at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-uR.

[9]              See Case Study: WASP America in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[10]             See “Coulter Confuses Confederate and American Flags” at http://wp.me/p4jHFp-fg.

[11]             See Case Study: Alt-Right in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

ACS: Impeachment, Coulter’s Crusade Against Clinton

Ann Coulter was at the epicenter of a secret cabal whose sole purpose was to bring down the Clinton presidency.[1]

Why? Coulter passionately hated the Clintons.

Ann Coulter – Hater!

Coulter adored John McCain before she despised him.

Coulter loved George W. Bush before she hated him.

Coulter worshiped Donald Trump before she detested him.

Before them, Coulter hated Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Coulter has always been a hater.[2]

Coulter on Bill Clinton

On MSNBC, 9/22/96:

“Bill Clinton is smarmy and slick and he really comes of well with people who are looking for government to be their mother or father.”

On MSNBC, 9/28/96:

“Bill Clinton is an incredibly unpopular president for a lot of reasons. He is up to his ears in financial problems, in murders all over the White House and in his background. This whole CIA and the drug deal brings up Mena, Arkansas and the drugs coming back on CIA flights into Mena.”

“It is peculiar how many people have died around President Clinton, from the wife of his security guard to his roommate at Oxford, Vince Foster.”

[For credibility, Coulter called allegations that Vince Foster was murdered an unfounded conspiracy theory in her first book, High Crimes and Misdemeanors.]

“Well, the odd thing about this – no, what I’m suggesting is with these people anything is possible. Nobody can just say ‘Oh, well, that’s preposterous!’ Anything is possible with him.”

On MSNBC, 10/6/96:

“smarmy Bill Clinton … Oprah-style of feeling everybody’s pain.”

On Politically Incorrect, 10/17/96:

“I think it’s clear [Bill and Hillary] loathe and detest one another, and this is political expediency.”

On Equal Time, 7/24/97:

“Bill Clinton has a 64 percent approval rating, something he’s never been able to get in the only public opinion poll that really counts, an election. He can’t even get 50 percent of the vote, but suddenly, 14 percent, after all these fund-raising scandals, love Bill Clinton. They’ve changed their mind. They didn’t vote for him two times in a row. I’m sorry, I don’t believe the media’s polls any more than I believe their impression of Newt Gingrich.”

“Well, except that, and Clinton would be lucky to have the American people believe that he’s only doing what the Republicans have been accused of, and that’s doing something legal that they’re claiming sort of looks bad. We have actual illegal activity under the current laws. The most you can say about Haley Barbour is money came in to a non-profit organization.”

On MSNBC, 2/9/97:

“It is more preposterous to say that when an 18-year-old girl is unconscious on a bed and her employer pulls a Bill Clinton move – raping an unconscious woman – and the judge has to say ‘Well, oh, this is the dream of a lot of males, honestly, to have an unconscious woman on a bed,’ I mean, you can’t say this is people not understanding domestic violence.”

After the commercial break:

“OK, [Bill Clinton] wasn’t accused of raping Paula Jones.”

On Hardball, 6/4/97:

“[Bill Clinton] routed S&L’s to fund his campaigns and political activities. That’s one sentence. That explains [the Whitewater scandal]. … He, through a series of deals took, took money illegally, defrauded the government.”

Coulter on Hillary Clinton

On MSNBC, 11/30/96:

“I couldn’t be happier if [Hillary Clinton] were put in charge of welfare reform. A highly-placed Democratic official was quoted in the New York Times yesterday that would be the kiss of death for any liberal welfare reform, so I must say I think it’s an excellent idea.”

“I think the President does sort of owe her. I mean, I think she has the goods on him. She’s kept her mouth quiet, she’s stood by him, and, ‘Oh, well, we’ve had our problems but I’m standing by my man.’ I, I, I think he, he, he cannot keep denying her like this.”

“And, so far her expertise in policy … She was elected to nothing, she was appointed to nothing, she was not nominated, she didn’t go through the Senate hearing, and she was put in charge of completely redesigning 1/6th of the American economy in, I think, a somewhat arrogant way for the entire administration and not just Hillary, but her personality didn’t help.”

“I think it’s just appalling the way she keeps hiding behind the fact that she is a woman. It has absolutely nothing to do with her being a woman.”

“She is constantly raising the fact that the reason she is being attacked is because she is a woman. No, it’s because her ideas are stupid. They were rejected. She assumed too much power.”

[This is the second in a multi-part series providing background and undisclosed details related to the impeachment of Bill Clinton.]

For details about the Machiavellian machinations of the secret cabal against Bill Clinton, see Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory at http://bit.ly/1M2z2O5.

  • Case Study #1: Oh, Paula (Jones)
  • Case Study # 2: (Linda) TRIPPed Up

Endnotes:


[1]              See Ann Coulter is at the Center of ACS: Impeachment at https://bit.ly/3BNYKpY.

[2]              See Chapter 7: The Spawn of Satan Convention in the Beauty of Conservatism at http://bit.ly/2a79k0j.

Ann Coulter is at the Center of ACS: Impeachment

Ann Coulter was part of a secret cabal which she adroitly called “a small, tightly-knit conspiracy.” The conspirators, whom Coulter impishly called “elves,” sought to bring down the Clinton presidency.


That was their sole goal: The demise of Bill Clinton’s presidency.

The conspirators, with Coulter as the crucial connection, were involved in both the Paula Jones lawsuit against Bill Clinton and the disposition of tapes of Monica Lewinsky secretly recorded by Linda Tripp. They sought to destroy Clinton’s presidency, but they also sought to keep their involvement totally secret, for reasons which will become apparent in the course of this series of columns.

Newsweek offers some background:

But it gets one thing wrong: “After Paula Jones filed her lawsuit, Coulter became an unpaid legal advisor on the case, working for Jones’ head lawyer Joseph Cammarata writing legal briefs.”

In reality, Cammarata knew nothing about the involvement of Coulter and the other elves in the Jones case. In fact, the elves actively sought to undermine an out-of-court settlement that Jones desperately desired. And they sought to do so under a cloak of darkness.

Newsweek also reports that George Conway (one of the elves) enlisted his friend, Coulter, into the cabal.

And it was Coulter who personally sabotaged the Jones case by leaking attorney-client privileged information to the press. Why? She said:

“I thought if I leaked the distinguishing characteristic it would show bad faith in negotiations. [Clinton lawyer] Bob Bennett would think Jones had leaked it. Cammarata would know he himself hadn’t leaked it and would get mad at Bennett. It might stall negotiations enough for me to get through to [Jones adviser] Susan Carpenter-McMillan to tell her that I thought settling would hurt Paula, that this would ruin her reputation, and that there were other lawyers working for her.”

As reported by Michael Isikofff, the elves "were terrified that Jones would settle. It was contrary to our purpose of bringing down the President."

Coulter recommended her close friend, Jim Moody, to act as attorney for Linda Tripp. Despite the conflict of interest, Moody gave Tripp’s tape to Coulter. Tripp, who never authorized Coulter to hear those tapes, testified that she heard rumors that Coulter had copied those tapes. According to the IOC, one or more of those tapes may have been tampered with. By whom?

Remember: Coulter boasted that she “got a bestseller out of it.” Indeed, impeachment skyrocketed Coulter to stardom.

Later, Coulter claimed that it was all for Paula Jones’ benefit and not to “get the President!”

[This is the first in a multi-part series providing background and undisclosed details related to the impeachment of Bill Clinton.]

See Case Study #1: Oh, Paula (Jones) in Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory at http://bit.ly/1M2z2O5.

Crazy @AnnCoulter Demands Trump Conviction for Wall

For weeks, Ann Coulter has tweeted that the Senate Republicans create a grand bargain in which they trade conviction of an innocent man for a border wall that the Democrats will never build.

Now, she has published an insane column to that very end!

Once again, Coulter is delusional!

And, yet again, Coulter continues to lie about Trump, who did build a wall.

When will her TDS end?

(Ann truly needs our prayers!)

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged explains why Coulter has become so unhinged!

FreeRepublic Responses

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3933476/posts.

Ann O’ Rexia.

Coulter just does not get it. The purpose of impeaching Trump is to destroy his America first, anti globalist ideology. An open border is critical to the globalist dream of a one world govenment controlled by elites. A border wall is a horror to the globalist. An open border is necessary to destroy the American nation and its culture.The globalist Democrats would never build a wall or do anything to enhance or protect the American nation.

Let’s convict a innocent man, for a crime others committed, which his accusers and judges facilitated through willful inaction, for which they all said worse, for a wall that will not be built. Articles like this are a reminder Ann crossed over to crazy years ago.

AC is just one initial away from AOC.

Can we build a wall around Ann’s house? Good lord, woman, just shut up.

I tired of Ann some years ago. She began to strike me as another one who was about herself and little else. (Ann, have you ever had a Big Mac?)

What a kook. No deals. He needs to be found innocent. Period.

Ms. Coulter’s proposal is equivalent to suggesting, “How about if I offer to let the mob drag my wife out into the streets and rape her and, in exchange, they promise to not molest my daughters?”

[Articles like this are a reminder Ann crossed over to crazy years ago.]

After unrelenting opposition from Republicans, democrats, Federal judges, he got about 750 miles of the wall built. Betrayal??? That woman has lost her mind.

Back in the nineties.we were all focused on the Clinton’s, and she was solid on the issues we were addressing. In the two thousands she started writing a bonehead article every so often. Now it seems she has gone full tilt moron.

Coulter used to be brilliant. Now she sits in the corner babbling nonsense and drooling on herself.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3933396/posts.

Can Coulter use the same Gorilla Glue that the idiot woman put in her hair on her 2 lips? Spare us, you haggard harridan.

Ann has come to the place where she is politically illiterate.

I absolutely loathe this woman. Always have from the moment she first came on the political scene.

Ann is a whore of the lowest degree

What a lunatic!

There is a logical gap in Ann’s reasoning. The obvious thing is the Dems will never fulfill a promise. They, like Lucy, will pull away the football and the Pubbies will fall on their asses. Ann does not need a football to kick. In this case, she has fallen on her ass all by herself.

Ugly says as ugly is

For quite a long time I was delusional as I thought good of this crazy woman.

She is a clown.

.@AnnCoulter’s Grand Bargain

TDS-addled Ann Coulter has repeatedly urged the Senate to convict Donald Trump in exchange for a wall!

Irrational? Yes!

Constitutional? No.

Coulter ignores several very obvious points:

  1. Trump is innocent. (But Coulter would convict an innocent man in order to get whatever she wants. Indeed, if the Left can convict Trump, who was president, for a crime he did not commit, then they can convict anyone!
  2. Trump is no longer president. Impeachment is designed to oust a president, but Trump is already out of office, so impeachment is nonsensical, except as a means of political and public humiliation. Coulter is obviously in favor of humiliating Trump in this, and any, fashion.
  3. Coulter would never get her wall. No matter what Democrats might promise, they would never build a wall. They hate the 450 miles of wall that Trump already built (but which Coulter denies exists)!
Comments on Coulter’s Tweets

Most comments on Coulter’s tweets were highly critical. Here is a sampling:

So you want to convict an innocent man out of what? Vindictiveness? You want the Senate to convict without any facts or proof of wrongdoing? You ant the gov’t to have so much power that all they have to do is point a finger at someone and falsely claim they committed a crime.

Please stop being obsessed with Trump. He’s gone. Focus your energy on stopping amnesty for 20 mil. illegals. Do something good for a change instead of continually being bitter with Trump.

What a wretched thing you are.

You hate our greatest President! You are sick!

Hey Ann how’s that TDS working out for you?

Ann, you are nuts. Biden already stopped your wall. Get over it.

You’re f’ing insane.

How can a lawyer from Cornell who authored 12 books be so ignorant?

Ann, what do you want to convict Trump for? Are you out of your mind? You seem to be pushing this BS that is all Theater. Impossible to convict so move on to another agenda.

Ann, you’re so sad, sounding like that little girl who didn’t get her way.

Offer a conviction in an unconstitutional process for funding for a project that has no majority support in the government? Are you insane?

She thinks an impeachment is fun. What a disgrace. If she needs that for fun, I wonder what life is for her.

Conviction in exchange for a wall? So that your wish can be fulfilled, let’s throw someone under the bus? What about a right to impartial process?

Give up the hatred.

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged shows why Coulter is so demented when it comes to Trump and his MAGA agenda.

.@AnnCoulter Claims Infallibility, Wants to Convict Trump, and Demands a Wall

In an astonishing tweet – just eight words – narcissist Ann Coulter 1) claimed infallibility, 2) called for the Senate to convict Trump on this second bogus impeachment, and 3) demanded a wall in return (quid pro quo).

Coulter hubris is detailed in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged.

As for an impeachment conviction, Coulter, a self-described constitutional attorney, should know better. Public officials cannot be impeached once they are out of office. The purpose of impeachment is to get them out of office.

Coulter’s #TDS continually blinds her to the reality that 1) Trump DID build a wall and that 2) a Democrat-led federal government will NEVER build a wall.

Coulter fans and critics alike lambasted Coulter for her lunacy.

She was called “insane and full of hate,” “blinded by hate” and “useless to conservatives.”

Many rejected Coulter’s attack on Trump, arguing that he was the greatest president of a lifetime, kept his promises, and fought for America!

Many of Coulter’s former fans are aghast at who and what she has become, calling her “pathetic,” “unprincipled,” a “traitor,” “totally irrelevant,” “spiteful,” a “psycho,” and a “buffon.”

People recommended that she get some professional help and medication. One kind soul offered this sage observation: “Bitterness is a choice.” Hebrews 12:15 warns, “looking carefully lest anyone fall short of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up cause trouble, and by this many become defiled.”

For a long time now, former and still current Coulter fans have asked “What happened to you?”

There are many reasons for Ann’s current mental and emotional state. Coulter is unquestionably filled with hubris, arguably insane, and all too often a fool.

Here’s why:

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged provides an in-depth, detailed analysis of why Ann Coulter has gone so berserk!

 

.@AnnCoulter ‘s Worst Column – EVER!

Ann Coulter’s last column during the Trump presidency is arguably her worst column ever!

Jennifer O’Connell even used Coulter’s essay as representative of the bitter Trumper. O’Connell observed (emphasis added):

“As much as I can translate the stream of consciousness, Coulter is unhappy at Trump’s inaction and his family, among other things. It’s hilarious that she wrote an entire book in 2016: In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome! and did her usual, dim-witted fangirling on Fox News throughout the campaign and in the first year of his administration. Must have sold a lot of books.”

Now Coulter does her best to malign him and everyone in the administration at every turn, whether it’s over the way he handled border issues, Supreme Court nominations, COVID, or the election challenges. There is nothing that Trump can do to make up for her heartbreak. Coulter acts very much like a jilted lover, except she’s the one that did the jilting.”

In a beautifully-expressed but tragically-deranged column, #TDS-addled Never Trumper Ann Coulter vented her eternal enmity for Donald Trump and his family, and she again attacked Israel and Jews.

Orwellian Ministry of Truth

Coulter’s column was filled with malicious mendacity and a potpourri of petty (phony) polemics. Coulter – a lover of Orwell’s 1984 (a book she re-reads every year) – employs many of Big Brother’s techniques in her own work,[1] and, in this column, goes full-bore Ministry of Truth which the former Soviet Union’s Pravda would applaud!

At times, her words were exquisitely-penned, yet irrational and counter-factual (i.e., Ann lied).

Coulter, Anti-Jew, Anti-Israel

Coulter again launched an attack on Jews and Israel.[2]

Trump Incites Riot!

Coulter even joined the chorus of leftists with another big lie, that Trump incited a riot! Notice her derision toward “gullible” Trump supporters who could be goaded “into criminal activity.” She claimed – without proof – that Trump “unleased” a “mob” and was “delighted” to do so!

How to Ratio an Ann Coulter Tweet – I

Coulter’s tweet about her column was ratio’d – big time! People quickly recognized it as fake news, hogwash, and baloney!

How to Ratio an Ann Coulter Tweet – II

Respondents called Coulter a “crazy maniac” who is “a caustic and toxic influence on American culture and politics.

Coulter’s Projection on Full Display

Coulter has been subject to the forces of addictive thinking for decades: denial, rationalization, and projection to name a few.[3]

Coulter is wrong about this one, too. Indeed, Coulter is engaging in a great deal of projection as she is the one who uses and discards people.[4]

Will Coulter ever see herself for who she really is? Or see reality with clarity? Pray that God remove the blinders and scales from her eyes. Otherwise, she will remain a bitter, angry, old woman.

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged provides an in-depth, detailed analysis of Coulter’s worldview and character flaws which have led her to be so wrong in so many areas in which she regards herself as an expert.

Endnotes:

[1]              See Propaganda: Orwell in the Age of Ann Coulter at http://bit.ly/1N7zDji.

[2]              See Case Study: #BlameJewsFirst in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[3]              See the Beauty of Conservatism at http://bit.ly/2a79k0j. See also Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory at http://bit.ly/1M2z2O5.

[4]              See Preface: Coulter Puts God and People in Boxes in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF and Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory at http://bit.ly/1M2z2O5.

Coulter Doesn’t Trust Trump

Ann Coulter, the author of In Trump We Trust, doesn’t trust Trump.

coulter-doesnt-trust-trump

She never really did.

Coulter has always cared about power and always cared about credit. So much so that she has sought power most of her adult life and claimed credit where it is not due. Coulter is an elite’s elite who loves wielding power.

Her decades-long pattern of behavior continued with her promotion of Donald Trump (and herself).

Coulter, the Bully

First, Coulter browbeat the electorate to vote for Trump, insisting he was the only person who could save America. Now, Coulter bullies, cajoles, and threatens Trump to do what she wants done.

Let’s remember the context. For years, Coulter did the very same thing with Romney. Remember, Coulter was careful to tell Romney that he owed her (personally). Coulter rammed Romney down our throats, promising us that he was the best and would get the job done, all the while warning Romney that he better do that very thing (see Case Study #6, Propaganda: Orwell in the Age of Ann Coulter).

But did Coulter ever trust Trump?

Hardly. Coulter repeatedly told Trump that he’d better do what he promised her he would do because of all the sacrifices she had made for him.

According to The Times, Coulter told Trump, “I’m the only one losing money trying to get you in the White House, you’re going to listen to me.” After Trump’s immigration flip-flop, a piqued Coulter joked, “He just said something stupid, which he’s done before, and he will do again … he does need a little slap now and then.”

Coulter’s face-slaps frequently include Twitter tirades and jeremiads against the only person in the world who can save America (according to her).

Coulter even threatened impeachment against her beloved Savior:  “The wall and deporting illegals … renegotiating trade deals and not starting pointless wars – those are the big ones. If he betrays us on those, they’ll impeach him and there’ll be nobody to defend him.”

Coulter, the Terrified

Coulter is absolutely terrified that she backed the wrong horse, that Trump will prove as unscrupulous as she is, thus jeopardizing what’s left of her own career. Coulter’s fate is inextricably linked to Trump’s.

In her last column in November, Coulter ominously described “How Trump Could Ruin His Presidency.” How? But not doing what Coulter tells him. Coulter succinctly wrote:

“He’d better!”

Also, “But if he breaks a major campaign promise, his supporters will turn on him with a blind ferocity, dwarfing their rage toward Jeb! because Trump’s is the more exquisite con. He will have duped them. And he will never, ever, ever get them back.”

Also, “If Trump betrays voters on immigration, he can have as many rallies as he wants, but Americans will say, Been there, done that — you screwed us. He will never escape the stink of broken campaign promises.”

Finally, “Whether he’s listening or not, his supporters are screaming: TRUMP! NOW! TAKE THE SHOT!!!”

Can you hear Coulter screaming?

Free Republic on Coulter

In the 1990s, members of Free Republic loved Coulter, called her the “goddess of the conservative movement,” and cherished everything she said and did. That has no longer been true for many years.

Here are a few highlights from just one Free Republic thread:

Ann can be NUTS, at times ( look how much she LOVED and pushed for that POS Romney!) and is ALWAYS looking for something to rant about. She does poorly when things are going well.”

“Hannity wanted to know WHY since she has Trump’s ear, she didn’t just call him up and since she knows his closest adviser/team why she just didn’t call them. She sputtered and fumed and then claimed that she had and went back to attacking. Perhaps ‘dear’ Ann isn’t as ‘CONNECTED’ as she claims to be. ;^)”

“I don’t dispute that she’s smart, but I’ll be honest with you and say she has a really grating way about her. If Hillary Clinton is ‘America’s Ex-Wife,’ I’d say Ann Coulter is ‘America’s Ex-Girlfriend.’

She’s being a stupid snowflake….demanding that SHE be allowed to pick Trump’s team; not him. And she just proved, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that she holds NO sway and worse…is NOT ‘in’ with Trump. She’s a damned DRAMA QUEEN and a poser.”

“She is just as world class a troll at generating attention and self-promotion as Trump is. Ann Coulter, first and foremost, is going to do what is in Ann Coulter’s financial interests, she lives by talking head appearances, book sales, social media, web sites, all of which demand promotion and the setting of narratives. Coulter’s tweet means nothing, other than she needs attention. Stop worrying.”

She thinks she is on the inside, but she is on the outside lookin in.”

“Ann, go get your head meds and eat the entire damn bottle.”

“She’s a brilliant writer but…this woman is just scitzo. I don’t know how else to put it.”

[A new book, #NeverTrump: Coulter’s Alt-Right Utopia, sheds some light on the #OnlyTrump movement and its Alt-Right constituency. It is now available on Amazon at http://amzn.to/2fzA9Mr.]

Coulter to Impeach Trump

Hell hate no fury like an Alt-Righter scorned!

coulter-to-impeach-trump

(And Trump isn’t even in office yet!)

On the Sean Hannity Show (11/15/16), Coulter summarized her (that is, Trump’s) policy agenda and what would befall President Trump should he fail to implement his (that is, her) agenda:

“The wall and deporting illegals … renegotiating trade deals and not starting pointless wars – those are the big ones. If he betrays us on those, they’ll impeach him and there’ll be nobody to defend him.”

In other words, if Trump doesn’t pursue and achieve her policy goals, he should and will be impeached.

High Crimes and Misdemeanors

But, in her 1998 bestseller, High Crimes and Misdemeanors, Coulter declared that impeachment is designed to target “moral misbehavior” and criminal activity, but not policy disputes.

Again, Coulter contradicts herself.

In 1998, Coulter was regarded as an expert on impeachment. In her book, Coulter wrote (emphasis added):

“Personal misconduct took a larger role in impeachments, for example, and policy disputes became irrelevant to impeachable conduct.” (pg. 10).

“One additional distinction the Constitution requires is this: policy disputes are not to be resolved by resort to impeachment.” (pp. 11-12).

“That policy disagreements cannot form the basis for an impeachable offense in this country is more than a logical deduction from the structure and purposes of the Constitution.” (pg. 12)

“Other comments from the framers further demonstrate that the purposes of impeachment did not include policy disputes – but did include personal misconduct.” (pg. 12)

Apparently, the Alt-Right will do whatever it takes – including threaten its standard-bearer – to achieve its goals.

[A new book, #NeverTrump: Coulter’s Alt-Right Utopia, sheds some light on the #OnlyTrump movement and its Alt-Right constituency. It is now available on Amazon at http://amzn.to/2fzA9Mr.]