ACS: Impeachment – Did Ann Coulter Tamper with Linda Tripp’s Tapes?

Ann Coulter played a crucial role in the impeachment of Bill Clinton.

First, she betrayed Paula Jones by leaking attorney client-privileged information to scuttle the settlement that Jones’ desired in her case against President Clinton. This meant that Jones’ case could be used in the impeachment.

Second, Coulter had illegal access to Linda Tripp’s illegally-recorded tapes of conversations with Monica Lewinsky and there is the possibility that she tampered with one or more of those tapes to remove exculpatory material or make portions of those tapes more damaging then they really were.

A rather curious sequence of events enabled Coulter to gain access to those critical tapes illegally recorded by Linda Tripp before they were turned over to the OIC. Coulter recommended one of her closest friends, Jim Moody, to represent Tripp, who accepted that recommendation despite his inexperience in that field of law. Moody replaced Kirby Behre as Tripp’s attorney.

Moody soon took possession of Tripp’s tapes. Behre confirmed that while the tapes were in his possession, no unauthorized individuals had access to them and no copies of those tapes were made.[1] Within hours, Coulter had access to those very tapes from Moody, whom she herself had suggested represent Tripp.

Coulter would later engage in damage control, writing,

“Moody came in to the case, Toobin says, when New York lawyer George Conway ‘remembered an old friend in Washington’ – Jim Moody. George Conway barely knew Jim Moody; the two had met only briefly once or twice before in group settings. It certainly was not George Conway who thought of suggesting his name to Tripp.”[2]

Coulter is right. It was Coulter herself who thought of suggesting Moody as Tripp’s lawyer. And it was Coulter to whom Tripp’s tapes were brought.

Early Morning Rendezvous

One of Coulter’s “greatest moments” had national implications and international repercussions. In the early morning hours of January 16, 1998, Coulter illegally listened to illegally-recorded audiotapes of conversations between Linda Tripp and her friend, Monica Lewinsky, who was President Clinton’s lover. Those tapes would prove crucial to impeaching Clinton and would pave Coulter’s path to glory, a glory which would somehow never transcend Coulter’s deep insecurity and low self-esteem.

Coulter could not contain her joy over gaining possession – secretly and illegally – of such a critical piece of evidence. She exclaimed,

“I must say, I don’t mind reliving the greatest night of my life over and over again. I was dancing a jig. I was bouncing off the walls.”[3]

To this day, it remains unknown whether Coulter tampered with those tapes prior to them being turned over to the OIC.

Five people, all lawyers, listened to those explosive tapes during the early morning hours of January 16, 1998. Conway and Moody were physically present with Coulter in her apartment, while Marcus and Porter participated via telephone conference call. Significantly, with the exception of Moody, all of those present (either in person or via telephone) have refused to comment on those events for this book.

Given Moody’s paranoid cloak-and-dagger evasive tactics[4] after obtaining the tapes from Kirby, why would he wait till the afternoon of the 16^th to turn them over to Starr’s office? He certainly wasn’t listening to them at his home on his antiquated tape recorder (the stated reason for playing them at Coulter’s apartment). Where were they and what was done with them?

The details are murky, but it is unquestioned that Coulter was in possession of those tapes – without the approval of Linda Tripp – before they were turned over to Ken Starr’s office.

The critical time frame – January 15-16, 1998 – has escaped serious scrutiny because the story is complicated, with overlapping sequences and a conflation of events. The three midnight meetings make for a good thriller, but confusion arises over which date each of those late night/early morning meetings actually occurred. Proper sequencing simplifies the complicated.

1/15/98      Moody acquires the Tripp tapes from Tripp’s previous lawyer (Behre).

1/16/98      At 2 a.m., the elves (Coulter, Moody, Conway, Marcus and Porter) listen to the tapes in Coulter’s apartment.

                  Moody gives one tape to the FBI in the morning and the remainder in the afternoon. (Where were those remaining tapes during the interval?)

                  Tripp tricks Lewinsky into a meeting at the Ritz-Carlton, where the FBI interrogates Lewinsky from 12:30 p.m. to 12:23 a.m.

                  That evening, Moody and Conway meet Jones’ attorney (Wesley Holmes) at Tripp’s home. Moody does not have the tapes which Holmes wanted to hear.

1/17/98      At a midnight meeting, the FBI gives a copy of the first tape back to Moody (with Conway hiding in the foyer). Around 12:30 a.m., that tape is played at Newsweek (Moody, Conway, Isikoff, McDaniel, Klaidman, Thomas) are present.

Disinformation from Moody

In late January, the Washington Post published this interesting piece of disinformation from the elves:

Moody is uncertain how Tripp learned about him, but he scoffs at the notion that he got the job because of ties to conservatives. His best guess is that while Tripp worked for the White House counsel’s office during the Bush administration, she was impressed with his success in badgering officials to drop decades-old regulations in the citrus industry.[6]

Everything Moody told the Washington Post was a lie. He knew who recommended him to Tripp (Coulter) and who was involved (all the anti-Clinton elves). His cover story was clearly concocted to preserve the identity of the (conservative) conspirators.

Citrus industry-deregulation as a prerequisite for pressing a sexual harassment case against the POTUS? Is it merely coincidence that Coulter would later publish a column in George magazine attacking Isikoff with these words:

“It’s not like we secretly disliked Clinton because of his administration’s position on California’s citrus cartels or something, and then set to work on some crazy scheme to destroy him using a pathological intern as our Mata Hari.”[7]

For the next six months, the elves operated in secrecy as Coulter wrote her book advocating the impeachment of President William Jefferson Clinton. During that time, she appeared on scores of TV shows to discuss the Clinton scandals and no one knew about her secret involvement with those scandals.

Coulter’s First Book

In High Crimes and Misdemeanors,[8] released in August, Coulter has surprisingly little to say about the Tripp tapes. The two most significant passages follow:

“Jones’s attorneys hadn’t deposed either Lewinsky or Tripp on the eve of Clinton’s deposition. That night, however, one of Jones’s lawyers [Wesley Holmes] informally interviewed Tripp to fill in the details of the anonymous phone calls.”

[REALITY CHECK: Holmes wanted to hear the tapes, which Moody no longer possessed.]

“Tripp had agreed to an informal meeting with Jones’s attorneys in hopes of avoiding a formal deposition. She had only recently discovered that her home state of Maryland was one of the few states that prohibit people from taping their own phone conversations without telling the other people on the line; she had not told Lewinsky …”

[REALITY CHECK: The elves, including Coulter, facilitated that meeting. Coulter left out their involvement, and their conflict of interest.]

Interestingly, Coulter later bragged about “getting a best-seller out of” her involvement with the elves.

Coulter Outed

Meanwhile, hidden from public view, was Coulter’s intimate knowledge of, and clandestine connection with, the now-infamous Tripp tapes. Ironically, it was the Starr Report which exposed her involvement:

“[Tripp] said she subsequently learned that Moody, before turning the tapes over to Starr’s office, had given them to Ann Coulter – a conservative lawyer and frequent talk show guest who has since written a book outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment – for copying.”[9]

The Starr Report included Tripp’s testimony which revealed that Coulter once had access to the tapes which ultimately led to Clinton’s impeachment. For a few weeks, the question was “What did Coulter hear and when did she hear it?” In the Starr Report, Tripp testified:

Q:        And your information was that he (Jim Moody) and a woman named Ann Coulter had copied the tapes, and that Ann Coulter had a complete set of tapes?

A:        Well, I was told from a couple of different sources – asked, actually, was I aware that … he had Ann Coulter make high speed dubbings of each tape … but has since listened to all the tapes.

“Tripp later testified that they [Coulter and Moody] did so [make copies of the tapes] contrary to her instructions.”[10]

Only the five conspirators knew of the early morning rendezvous when they listened to Tripp’s tapes in Coulter’s apartment. How, then, did Tripp hear rumors of that event? After all, the elves were almost pathological in keeping their activities and identities secret. So, who told what, when, and why?

Perhaps Coulter could not contain herself over what she described as the “greatest night” of her life. She was, you will recall, the elf who gave the elves their name in her hint to Isikoff in 1997. The baby princess had to prove her worth despite the need for secrecy.

The media’s suspicions were initially aroused when, in a Crossfire debate, [11] Coulter refused to give a direct answer on this topic: “A real quick question on the tapes. Have you ever personally listened to the Linda Tripp tapes? … How’d you get them?” Caught off guard, Coulter gave a Clintonesque evasion. When she was first publicly questioned about her connection with the Tripp tapes, Coulter was speechless! Then she asked a delaying question: “Which tapes?” Then she gave a non-responsive Clintonesque admission: “Well, do you think it’s OK for a president to perjury himself under oath? So what do you think of a political pundit lying on TV?”

Why such obfuscation if there’s nothing to hide? Was Coulter concerned about the legal ramifications of her actions? Why not speak the truth? Even the Washington Post reported that event:

“On a recent edition of ‘Crossfire,’ Coulter was briefly speechless when asked if she had heard any of Tripp’s tapes before the story became public. She now admits she heard one of the tapes, saying that an unidentified friend needed her recording equipment to copy it.”[12]

Three days later, towards the end of her book tour for High Crimes and Misdemeanors, Coulter gave a speech in which she tried to dismiss her own involvement with the tapes which led to the subject of her book:

“In this document dump on Friday I made my debut in Volume III in which I was accused in Linda Tripp’s testimony of making copies of all of her tapes. She had heard rumors that I made copies of all 17 tapes back in January, which I can assure you if it had been true they would have been – all over the world – air-dropped by January 22^nd. And apparently that’s what Ken Starr’s prosecutors thought because I never heard from them. But, you know, suppose I were asked, “Did you make copies of these tapes?” Well, I suppose, you know, I could just say “No,” then later say, “Well, when you said tape I mean a track tape and listen, really what, what does it really mean to listen? Listening is one of the great mysteries of life.”[13]

Evasion, wrapped in humor and blanketed by rationalizations. If the President of the United States can debate the definition of the word “is,” surely Coulter can play the same semantic game. After all, she’s one of the “good guys.”

Denials and Smokescreens

On Rivera Live,[14] Coulter first denied hearing the Tripp tapes, then admitted to hearing one tape, and lied about her source for the tapes.

RIVERA:         “Did you ever listen to and/or make copies of those tapes?”

COULTER:      “No, I literally would have had them air-dropped across America and I’d probably be a millionaire by now. … they would have been on Entertainment Tonight, they would have been on your show and I’d be a multi-millionaire.”

Interestingly, just hours before I had interviewed Moody about whether Coulter had copied the tapes. His reply was almost identical – “If she had them, believe me, she would have been the first to release them wholesale. I mean, she’s doing a book on the Clinton scandals.”[15] – the very same argument used by Coulter on Rivera Live later that night.

Directly challenged by Rivera, Coulter conceded listening to one of the tapes: “I heard the same tape that was described by Newsweek.”

But Coulter adamantly denied getting the tape from Moody: “I got nothing out of him [Moody] and I must say being one of his friends that did annoy me.” Is it coincidental that Moody also spoke of Coulter’s annoyance at him over the tapes? Moody told me, “She’s kind of annoyed at me for not giving her the tapes so she could put them in her book.”[16]

Still, Coulter continued to blow smokescreens, claiming she got the tapes in her capacity as a journalist/investigative reporter (“people send me things”). In fact, she got the tapes because of her friendship with Moody.

In discussing the tapes, Rivera said, “You got a bestseller out of it.” Coulter boasted: “Yes, I did.”[17] Coulter herself noted the exquisite timing of High Crimes – “Yeah, it was good timing”[18] – and, tongue-in-cheek, admitted “I thought impeachment might be in the news this year.”[19] How and why did she think so? And did Coulter orchestrate to some degree the events which thrust her into the limelight and her book to the top of the best-seller list?

What is the truth behind the Tripp tapes and what exactly was Coulter’s role? To what extent has Coulter manipulated the media and the judicial system for her own personal gain? And to what degree has Coulter changed history for the benefit of her own career?

Coulter admitted she “had” (indicating active possession and not passive audience) “them” (i.e., more than one). Furthermore, Coulter and Moody BOTH admit that she asked him for the tapes. They BOTH said she didn’t get the tapes. They BOTH said she was “annoyed” at his refusal. They BOTH said that if she had gotten the tapes she would have published them and made a fortune. They BOTH lied. Repeatedly.

Link Between Tripp and Jones

Two days later a Washington Post profile of Coulter exposed her secret connection with both Jones and Tripp.

She referred Linda Tripp to her attorney friend Jim Moody (Coulter and Moody are both Deadheads who followed the Grateful Dead to dozens of far-flung concerts, she says). Coulter says she suggested to Moody that Tripp take her tapes of Monica Lewinsky to independent counsel Kenneth Starr; he had already thought of the idea.[20]

She advised Paula Jones’s lawyers in their suit against Clinton and helped Jones find new attorneys when the first pair quit.[21]

“I was a little concerned about the ‘right-wing cabal’ appearance of things,” Coulter says. Although Starr is examining whether Tripp lied about how the tapes were made, Coulter says she’s not worried about being questioned.[22]

Both Coulter and Moody say he was not the source of the tape she heard. “She’s kind of annoyed at me for not giving her the tapes so she could put them in her book,” Moody says. Still, he says, “I always enjoy her because she doesn’t pull her punches. We all want to appear dignified and thoughtful and contemplative, and Ann is just Ann.”[23]

From the beginning, the elves secretly and zealously conspired to topple the Clinton presidency. They also desperately sought to keep their involvement secret. When their involvement came to light, they stonewalled – refusing to cooperate with legitimate investigations into their actions.

Flip-Flop on Tapes

Once Tripp’s tapes had served their purpose – furthering the cause of impeachment – Coulter downplayed their importance. Months earlier Coulter was a one-woman ad campaign promoting their significance.

“23 hours of tapes. On C-Span, over and over and over again. … and there are 23 hours of tapes. … It’s not Clinton vs. Starr. It’s not even Clinton vs. Congress. It’s C-Span playing all of the evidence that Ken Starr has, including, at a minimum, 23 hours of tapes of Monica Lewinsky weeping and crying – on the phone.  … But moreover, the important point is – Look! The most important point of what you just said was that Monica denies it. Well, no, actually, she’s on tape admitting to it when she doesn’t know she’s being taped. She has said nothing since then … But she’s on tape. This is why tapes are such amazing evidence.”[24]

Pressure became so intense that Coulter became desperate not to talk about the Tripp tapes. Again, on Rivera Live, Coulter said:

“[Asked about her source for the tapes] I will stipulate to the fact that I’m a drug-dealing serial killer so that we can talk about something other than me [laughingly]. … [asked about testifying before OIC] Let’s assume I’m the devil incarnate [laughingly]. … I don’t want to talk about the tapes. I want to talk about Clinton.”[25]

Why the flip-flop?

The day after her Crossfire debate Newsday reported that some of those tapes had been tampered with. “Tripp also indicated that Moody may have an explanation for the mystery surrounding her tapes – which, according to FBI forensic tests, have in some cases been duplicated or tampered with.”[26] Apparently nine of 27 Tripp tapes “were copied from the originals” and “one tape may have been tampered with,”[27] sparking controversy over their credibility. One example of a corrupted critical passage is this one concerning Lewinsky’s fear for her life:

LEWINSKY:    “I know [tape skip] [inaudible] my mom will kill me if I don’t tell him – make it clear at some point that I’m not going to hurt him, because – see, my mom’s big fear is that he’s going to send somebody out to kill me.”

The previous portion of the tape shows Tripp encouraging Lewinsky to hang up on the president, not talk to him:

TRIPP:             “Well, let me put it to you this way. By hanging up and saying you’re telling your parents, and then hanging up the phone, you’re saying a whole hell of a lot more than you could ever do in a 20-minute conversation.”

Who tampered with the tapes? Was exculpatory evidence erased? Was damaging evidence fabricated? Who stood to profit?

Prior to this revelation, Coulter lied about hearing the Tripp tapes: “I was just thinking last night one thing we still have to hear are the tapes. The two most famous women in America, Monica Lewinsky and Linda Tripp and no one has ever heard their voices.”[28] Of course, Coulter had heard those voices.

Suspiciously, Coulter and Moody told almost the exact same story. Their cover story: absence of widespread dissemination and personal profit. Coincidental? Coulter lied about hearing the Tripp tapes, about having the Tripp tapes, and about her source for the Tripp tapes.[29]

Still, few people grasped the import of Coulter’s possession of those tapes.

For further details about the Machiavellian machinations of the secret cabal against Bill Clinton, see Case Study #2: (Linda) TRIPPed Up! in Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory at http://bit.ly/1M2z2O5.

Endnotes:

---

[1]       Author interview.

[2]       Ann Coulter, “Vast concoctions II,” 3/10/00.

[3]       David Daley, “Ann Coulter: lights all shining on her,” Hartford Courant, 6/25/99.

[4]       Susan Schmidt and Michael Weisskopf, Truth at Any Cost: Ken Starr and the Unmaking of Bill Clinton, HarperCollins, 2000, pg. 34.

[5]       David Daley, “Ann Coulter: lights all shining on her,” Hartford Courant, 6/25/99.

[6]       David Segal, “Dream Case Is a Burden, Lawyer Finds: No Pay, Long Hours For Tripp’s Counsel,” Washington Post, 1/26/98, pg. A09. See http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/moody012698.htm.

[7]       Ann Coulter, “Spikey and Me,” George, May 1999.

[8]       Ann Coulter, High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton, Regnery, 1998, pg. 31.

[9]       John Riley, “Starr Aide’s Role As Tripp Advisor,” Newsday, 10/3/98.

[10]     Joe Conason and Gene Lyons, The Hunting of the President: The Ten-Year Campaign to Destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton, St. Martin’s Griffin, 2000, pg. 351.

[11]     Ann Coulter, Crossfire, CNN, 10/2/98.

[12]     Howard Kurtz, “The Blonde Flinging Bombshells at Bill Clinton,” Washington Post, 10/16/98. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/coulter101698.htm.

[13]     Ann Coulter, speech at Monday Club, Washington, D.C., 10/5/98.

[14]     Rivera Live, CNBC, 10/14/98.

[15]     Author interview.

[16]     Howard Kurtz, “The Blonde Flinging Bombshells at Bill Clinton,” Washington Post, 10/16/98, pg. D4.

[17]     Rivera Live, 11/16/98.

[18]     Ann Coulter, Equal Time, 8/19/98.

[19]     Ann Coulter, Drudge Report, 8/8/98.

[20]     Howard Kurtz, “The Blonde Flinging Bombshells at Bill Clinton,” Washington Post, 10/16/98. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/coulter101698.htm.

[21]     Ibid.

[22]     Ibid.

[23]     Ibid.

[24]     Ann Coulter, Rivera Live, CNBC, 3/4/98.

[25]     Ann Coulter, Rivera Live, CNBC, 10/23/98.

[26]     John Riley, “Starr Aide’s Role As Tripp Advisor,” Newsday, 10/3/98.

[27]     Carl Limbacher, “Tripp Tape ‘Doctored’ where Monica Speaks of Death Fears,” Newsmax.com, 10/6/98.

[28]     Ann Coulter, Inside Politics, CNN, 5/6/98.

[29]     Howard Kurtz, “The Blonde Flinging Bombshells at Bill Clinton,” Washington Post, 10/16/98, pg. D4.

Advertisement

ACS: Impeachment – Coulter Betrays Paula Jones

Coulter’s Perfect Storm

The Perfect Storm dramatized the real-life story of a sword-fishing crew caught in “the storm of the century,”) created by the confluence of weather conditions creating the perfect storm.[1] Many Republicans desperately sought to find the Perfect Storm (scandal) to finally bring down President Clinton, otherwise known as the Comeback Kid and Slick Willy, for his ability to evade responsibility for any number of scandals and imbroglios. With the Lewinsky scandal, conservatives thought they had discovered their political Perfect Storm.

In the midst of “serious” Clinton-administration scandals, Paula Jones’ story of sexual harassment by then-Governor Bill Clinton seemed more a nuisance than anything else.

Jones claimed her reputation had been damaged and she sought an out-of-court settlement to escape the limelight. (Jones: “I wanted this case settled. I always wanted this case settled.”^[2])

Enter the Elves

Right-wing hatred of Bill and Hillary Clinton began long before Clinton’s first inaugural. Joe Conason and Gene Lyons documented what they regard as a ten-year campaign by the Right to bring down the Clinton administration.[3] Hillary Clinton exaggerated the extent of that campaign with her almost paranoid perception of a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.

However, a small, tightly-knit cadre of conspirators, colorfully known as “the elves,” served the purpose by enthusiastically pursuing the downfall of the Clintons. Their methodology included legal maneuverings and illegal machinations, investigative and tabloid journalism, media manipulation, betrayal of at least one colleague and of at least one client, and, perhaps, even tampering with evidence and unethical conduct with the Office of Independent Counsel (OIC).

The elves were a “secret clique of lawyers in their thirties … [who] were deeply involved for five years in the Paula Jones lawsuit … Ms. Jones never knew they worked on her behalf.”[4] The elves began their work in the early 90s. George Conway, Richard Porter and Jerome Marcus formed the core of the conspiratorial group, searching out Clinton scandals to exploit and using their legal expertise and political connections to good advantage.

It is almost certain that Coulter was privy to their activities while on the periphery of the circle of elves during the mid-90s. At a critical juncture in the summer of 1997, Ann Coulter entered the fray, providing clandestine behind-the-scenes legal services for Jones. The secrecy, apparently, was for Coulter’s sake because she reportedly feared the disapproval of her law firm, the Center for Individual Rights.

By then, she had become a key conspirator and major player since she alone, of all the elves, spoke at length with Jones and then, in early 1998, enabled her close friend, Jim Moody, to become Linda Tripp’s attorney. Coulter later joked about the conspiracy, “I’m ticked off the Federalist Society is getting all the credit for this conspiracy – it should be the Dead.”[5]

Coulter’s involvement with both the Paula Jones sexual harassment case against Bill Clinton and Linda Tripp’s taped conversations with Monica Lewinsky would prove crucial to not only undermining the Clinton agenda and tarnishing the Clinton legacy, but would also provide the impetus for impeachment of the President and, not coincidentally, provide Coulter with her first best-seller.

Getting the President

Coulter’s unbridled hatred for feminism reached fever pitch with her 1991 unpublished essay for National Review. Her enmity eventually expanded to include all liberals, especially Bill and Hillary Clinton. Like many conservatives during the mid-90s, Coulter viewed the Clinton presidency as illegitimate, and, like many conservatives, Coulter wanted that presidency to end. Coulter’s soon-to-become close friend, Rush Limbaugh, often spoke of “America Held Hostage” and his show featured a daily countdown to freedom. To them, the two-term Clinton presidency was a fluke (at best) or the product of a liberal media conspiracy (at worst).

At the very time Coulter was writing her Human Life Review essay attacking Supreme Court Justice Brennan for his misogyny, she was secretly “helping” Paula Jones in her sexual harassment lawsuit against President Clinton. Coulter’s help proved disastrous for Jones and her family. In the end, Coulter would harm Jones more than Clinton had allegedly done – all because her end (“get the president”) justified the means (destroying Jones’ life).

Coulter’s Betrayal

As it turned out, Coulter’s goal was not to represent her client but to “get the president.” Consequently, after Coulter gained possession of incendiary information – namely, the specific nature of Clinton’s “distinguishing characteristics” which Jones claimed to be able to identify – Coulter vigorously leaked those details to the press for the express purpose of sabotaging Jones’ delicate settlement negotiations.[6] As Coulter herself admits: “We were terrified that Jones would settle. It was contrary to our purpose of bringing down the president.”[7]

There was only one thing to do: scuttle the negotiations by planting a rumor – by disclosing secret attorney-client privileged information. Just as Coulter’s legal assistance to Jones was secret, as was her planted story, again to protect Coulter, not Jones.

To preclude settlement, Coulter approached numerous media outlets to leak a rumor that Clinton was afflicted with Peyronie’s Disease. Coulter was furious with those media outlets which declined to publish her rumor, and she was elated at its exposure on the Drudge Report. From that point on, Coulter and Drudge would become close friends.

Coulter aggressively promoted her rumor, eventually finding fertile soil in the print media (Newsday), on talk radio (Don Imus) and on national TV (Rivera Live). Even the Washington Times[8] reported the rumor. Coulter’s anonymously-released rumor hit the front pages of the nation’s newspapers: “The New York Post ran a one-page story of the ‘distinguishing characteristics.’ So did the Washington Times, complete with Paula Jones’ diagnosis as to what caused the distinction.”[9]

That rumor definitively scuttled any chance of an out-of-court settlement between President Clinton and his alleged victim. Coulter took pride in anonymously exposing the rumor (and later using this published rumor she planted as source material) in order to thwart the legal efforts of Paula Jones’ attorneys.[10] As Coulter explained, “I thought if I leaked the distinguishing characteristic it would show bad faith in negotiations. Bob Bennett would think Jones had leaked it. Cammaratta would know he himself hadn’t leaked it and would get mad at Bennett. It might stall negotiations.”[11]

Even Jones’ own actual attorney, Joseph Cammaratta, was unaware of Coulter’s involvement: “It was amazing to me to hear of her involvement with the case. I can’t remember hearing her name.”[12] Coulter worked “behind the scenes as an advisor to [Paula] Jones’s strategists,”[13] leaked the bombshell privileged information to the media, and then blamed the Jones’ genuine legal team for its release.

“Most women I know want further details on this DPC [Distinguishing Personal Characteristics]. We don’t actually know that it was Peyronie’s Disease, this was just a little tangent that Paula Jones’ earlier lawyers went on to. All she said was that it was slightly bent. So there’s my last parting comment because that’s what women really want to know most about from what I can tell.”[14]

“Ken Starr with 30 million dollars and the top prosecutors in the country hasn’t been able to lay a finger on Clinton, and poor little picked on Paula Jones has completely destroyed him and humiliated him.”[15]

Author Joe Conason later clarified matters for Geraldo Rivera, saying,

“The official Paula Jones lawyers – Gil Davis and Joe Cammaratta, whom you’ve had on this program – did want to settle. It was the secret Paula Jones lawyers – George Conway, and others, including Ann Coulter, who’s been on here many times – who did their best to sabotage the settlement.”[16]

Consequences of Conspiracy

In a speech earlier that year, “Coulter further made her case that Jones was wronged, not only by the President, but also by ‘the media, lawyers, and feminists.’”[17] Pardon me, but Coulter – as a member of the media, while a lawyer, and being a post-feminist – certainly wronged Jones.

During the scandal, Coulter expressed not one word of empathy for Paula Jones. Indeed, Coulter gloried in Paula’s misery because Paula became a weapon to use against the President.

As a result of the sabotaged negotiations, Jones reluctantly went to court, the Lewinsky scandal erupted, and Jones’ life was radically altered. Rather than receiving the settlement she so desperately desired, Jones entered media hell and gained a fractured family. Coulter, however, benefited, later boasting that she “got a bestseller out of it.”^[18] Meanwhile, Jones remained in media hell.

But why would Coulter care? She never cared about Jones! This came sharply into focus when Coulter exclaimed, “I love the facts about this case.”[19] And then gleefully recounted the specifics of the Jones’ lawsuit – even having memorized the paragraph numbers of the lawsuit. Others would have been horrified at the facts of her case – not “loved” them.

One might expect outrage over a sexual assault, or righteous indignation over abuse of power. Instead, Coulter’s face, voice and body language exulted in pure joy. (Empathy for Jones was absent; present, instead, was exultation and anticipated victory over the Clintons.)

Hypocritically, the elves’ secret machinations ultimately led to the public humiliation of both Jones (their client) and Tripp (their other client, whose tapes they unscrupulously obtained). In the name of preserving the “rule of law” (their refrain throughout the Clinton presidency), they willfully violated attorney-client confidentiality.

In the name of vindicating Jones’ reputation, they propelled her to public ridicule, then, once their purposes had been served, Coulter condemned Jones as “trailer park trash” – the very charge the elves were purportedly repudiating at the outset. 

In the end, the elves surreptitiously shaped history and irreparably transformed America’s political and cultural landscape. As Coulter would put it:

“I do think [Tripp is] a great American hero. We never would have found out about the corruption and illegality at the very top of the government but for Linda Tripp. If you imagine what the world would be like if Linda Tripp hadn’t kept those tapes – a very different world.”[20]

Despite the murkiness of their secretive shenanigans, sufficient details exist within the public sphere to gain a good grasp of their activities. Certainly, these affairs offer a glimpse into their character – so much so that Coulter would later gloat over her own involvement.

Ann Coulter, “attorney and self-admitted anti-Clinton elf,”^[21] styles herself as the consummate champion of the weak and voiceless, citing her clandestine aid to Paula Jones as evidence. As it turns out, Coulter’s service was self-serving, not selfless, and the beneficiary of her help became impoverished, not enriched.

For details about the Machiavellian machinations of the secret cabal against Bill Clinton, see Case Study #1: Oh, Paula (Jones)! in Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory at http://bit.ly/1M2z2O5.

Endnotes:

---

[1]       http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1800352372/details, accessed 9/27/07.

[2]       Paula Jones, Rivera Live, CNBC, 10/25/00.

[3]       Joe Conason and Gene Lyons, The Hunting of the President: The Ten-Year Campaign to Destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton, St. Martin’s Griffin, 2000.

[4]       New York Times, 1/24/99.

[5]       Michael Isikoff and Evan Thomas, “The Secret War,” Newsweek, 2/9/98, pg. 43.

[6]       David Daley, “Ann Coulter: lights all shining on her,” Hartford Courant, 6/25/99.

[7]       Michael Isikoff, Uncovering Clinton: A Reporter’s Story, Crown, 1998, pg. 183.

[8]       F.J. Murray, “Is This The President’s ‘Distinguishing Characteristic?’” Washington Times, 10/15/97.

[9]       Mary McGrory, “’Distinguishing’ Journalism,” 11/6/97.

[10]     Ann Coulter, Hartford Courant, 6/25/99.

[11]     Ibid.

[12]     Author interview.

[13]     Mary Jacoby, “The Pundettes,” Capital Style, December 1997.

[14]     Ann Coulter, Vantage Points: Issues for Women, Amazon City Radio, 12/5/97.

[15]     Ibid.

[16]     Joe Conason, Rivera Live, CNBC, 3/15/00.

[17]     Jillian Ruddiman, Quad News, http://quad.wcupa.edu/78/09/news/president.shtml.

[18]     Rivera Live, CNBC, 11/16/98.

[19]     Ann Coulter, MSNBC, 6/7/97.

[20]     Ann Coulter, Rivera Live, CNBC, 5/24/00.

[21]     Geraldo Rivera, Rivera Live, CNBC, 6/7/00.

Coulter’s Cognitive Dissonance

Is the often brilliant Ann Coulter scatterbrained? One could arguably say so.

Indeed, for over two decades, Coulter has suffered from cognitive dissonance and the negative consequences of addictive thinking.[1]

In Orwellian terms, Coulter suffers from doublethink – believing two diametrically opposite things at the very same time.[2]

Coulter’s column on 9/15/21 is emblematic of this strange phenomenon.[3]

In it, Coulter simultaneously condemns the dismantling of Confederate “antiquities,” which she calls part of her history, while taking pride in her Presbyterian ancestors who were abolitionists fighting for the Union against slavery.[4] Cognitive dissonance.

Her essay title: Gray Lives Matter.

Gray = Confederate, not Union.[5]

Coulter has – for decades – defended the Confederacy while simultaneously extolling her heroic Union ancestors.[6]

Coulter has insisted that everyone should listen to her yet has admitted that she’s bad at making predictions. Indeed, she has come to loathe every presidential candidate she endorsed or campaigned for.[7]

Coulter was fiercely for the war on terror before she was against it.[8]

Coulter championed tax cuts for decades but now is in favor of a (Socialist) wealth tax.[9]

Once ardently pro-life, Coulter abandoned the pro-life movement for personal and political purposes.[10]

To further understand Coulter’s wacky worldview and why she takes such contradictory positions at the very same time, see Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

Endnotes:

---

[1]              See Chapter 2: The Cuckolding of Conscience in the Beauty of Conservatism at http://bit.ly/2a79k0j.

[2]              See Chapter 2: Delusional – New Ann Coulter Book in Propaganda: Orwell in the Age of Ann Coulter at http://bit.ly/1N7zDji.

[3]              See Coulter’s America (belongs uniquely to Ann) at https://bit.ly/3tKwkdA.

[4]              See Case Study: Alt-Right in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[5]              BLUE Lives Matter would have championed both the Union and law enforcement.

[6]              See Case Study: Alt-Right in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[7]              See Case Study: #CoulterMeltdown in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[8]              See Case Study: From Jingoist to Pacifist in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[9]              See Case Study: #AnnOcasioCoulter in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[10]             See Case Study # 8 – Life Issues in Propaganda: Orwell in the Age of Ann Coulter at http://bit.ly/1N7zDji.

Coulter’s America (belongs uniquely to Ann)

Ann Coulter’s column this week confirms what I have been saying for years: Coulter believes America belongs to her!

Hence her being the authority on who a real American is.

Hence her dismissal of 13 heroic Americans who died in Kabul (they weren’t WASP enough).[1]

Hence her obsession with immigration and blindness to the chaos of the Biden administration (which she blames on Trump).

Here’s necessary context for Coulter’s column. Because the world revolves around Coulter,[2] the American Identity revolves around Coulter’s family.[3]

Coulter demands sole control over America’s identity[4] and role in the world.[5]

Coulter’s views on race, immigration, and foreign policy must be strictly adhered to or you will be denounced as a traitor. Trump’s failure – in her eyes – to pursue her agenda for America First fostered her hatred for Trump.[6]

So much so that Coulter trashed Trump despite Trump’s triumphs for peace and prosperity,[7] even going so far as to demand his second impeachment for yet another hoax and witch hunt.[8]

Coulter’s Narcissistic Column

Coulter began her column, writing:

“My ancestors were Presbyterian abolitionists who fought on the Union side, but I get really ticked off when imbeciles take a sledgehammer to my country’s history.”

Coulter lauds her perfect WASP ancestors fighting against slavery, calling it “my country’s history.”[9] (Ironically, her ancestors also owned slaves.)

Coulter continued, defending Robert E. Lee:

“Never has a civil war ended with such love between the former enemies. That’s our history, our country, our war — North and South, black and white.”

Coulter then segued to bashing immigrants and blaming them for the carnage (without citing any evidence):

“No, the moving force behind this frenzied destruction of American history isn’t black people suddenly offended by monuments that have been around for a century; it’s pushy newcomers, bitter that their ancestors had nothing to do with the creation of this country. After other people’s ancestors carved a nation out of the wilderness, they just kind of showed up. Now they go around obliterating anything that reminds them that this country was up and running long before they got here.”

Are these so-called “pushy newcomers” really the ones trashing America? Where’s her proof?

Coulter again defended the Confederacy while undercutting her own argument:

“America’s leading hate group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, titles its report on Confederate symbols ‘Whose Heritage? Public Symbols of the Confederacy.’ Yes, exactly, it’s not their heritage, so it must be destroyed. My ancestors fought on the Union side, but they were involved, and it matters to me.”

Coulter again confuses the Confederacy with the United States, even though she repeatedly tells us her ancestors fought for the Union.[10]

“MSNBC’s smirking Chris Hayes can get weepy about some ancient Roman ruin, and Rachel Maddow about a building in Warsaw, but I care about my history. These savages are smashing and graffitiing my antiquities.”

Coulter is rightly upset over cultural Marxism and the toppling of statues and monuments by people whom she calls “savages.” Are Confederate statues and monuments really Ann’s “history” and her “antiquities”?[11]

To further understand Coulter’s worldview, see Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

Endnotes:

---

[1]              See Ann Coulter: “Let Them All Die” at https://bit.ly/3kmDIYH.

[2]              See Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory at http://bit.ly/1M2z2O5.

[3]              See Case Study: Settler in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[4]              See Case Study: WASP America in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[5]              See Case Study: From Jingoist to Pacifist in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[6]              See Case Study: #WackyNutJob in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[7]              See Apocalyptic @AnnCoulter Screams Doomsday in Midst of American Renaissance at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-pa.

[8]              See Crazy @AnnCoulter Demands Trump Conviction for Wall at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-uR.

[9]              See Case Study: WASP America in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[10]             See “Coulter Confuses Confederate and American Flags” at http://wp.me/p4jHFp-fg.

[11]             See Case Study: Alt-Right in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

ACS: Impeachment, Coulter’s Crusade Against Clinton

Ann Coulter was at the epicenter of a secret cabal whose sole purpose was to bring down the Clinton presidency.[1]

Why? Coulter passionately hated the Clintons.

Ann Coulter – Hater!

Coulter adored John McCain before she despised him.

Coulter loved George W. Bush before she hated him.

Coulter worshiped Donald Trump before she detested him.

Before them, Coulter hated Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Coulter has always been a hater.[2]

Coulter on Bill Clinton

On MSNBC, 9/22/96:

“Bill Clinton is smarmy and slick and he really comes of well with people who are looking for government to be their mother or father.”

On MSNBC, 9/28/96:

“Bill Clinton is an incredibly unpopular president for a lot of reasons. He is up to his ears in financial problems, in murders all over the White House and in his background. This whole CIA and the drug deal brings up Mena, Arkansas and the drugs coming back on CIA flights into Mena.”

“It is peculiar how many people have died around President Clinton, from the wife of his security guard to his roommate at Oxford, Vince Foster.”

[For credibility, Coulter called allegations that Vince Foster was murdered an unfounded conspiracy theory in her first book, High Crimes and Misdemeanors.]

“Well, the odd thing about this – no, what I’m suggesting is with these people anything is possible. Nobody can just say ‘Oh, well, that’s preposterous!’ Anything is possible with him.”

On MSNBC, 10/6/96:

“smarmy Bill Clinton … Oprah-style of feeling everybody’s pain.”

On Politically Incorrect, 10/17/96:

“I think it’s clear [Bill and Hillary] loathe and detest one another, and this is political expediency.”

On Equal Time, 7/24/97:

“Bill Clinton has a 64 percent approval rating, something he’s never been able to get in the only public opinion poll that really counts, an election. He can’t even get 50 percent of the vote, but suddenly, 14 percent, after all these fund-raising scandals, love Bill Clinton. They’ve changed their mind. They didn’t vote for him two times in a row. I’m sorry, I don’t believe the media’s polls any more than I believe their impression of Newt Gingrich.”

“Well, except that, and Clinton would be lucky to have the American people believe that he’s only doing what the Republicans have been accused of, and that’s doing something legal that they’re claiming sort of looks bad. We have actual illegal activity under the current laws. The most you can say about Haley Barbour is money came in to a non-profit organization.”

On MSNBC, 2/9/97:

“It is more preposterous to say that when an 18-year-old girl is unconscious on a bed and her employer pulls a Bill Clinton move – raping an unconscious woman – and the judge has to say ‘Well, oh, this is the dream of a lot of males, honestly, to have an unconscious woman on a bed,’ I mean, you can’t say this is people not understanding domestic violence.”

After the commercial break:

“OK, [Bill Clinton] wasn’t accused of raping Paula Jones.”

On Hardball, 6/4/97:

“[Bill Clinton] routed S&L’s to fund his campaigns and political activities. That’s one sentence. That explains [the Whitewater scandal]. … He, through a series of deals took, took money illegally, defrauded the government.”

Coulter on Hillary Clinton

On MSNBC, 11/30/96:

“I couldn’t be happier if [Hillary Clinton] were put in charge of welfare reform. A highly-placed Democratic official was quoted in the New York Times yesterday that would be the kiss of death for any liberal welfare reform, so I must say I think it’s an excellent idea.”

“I think the President does sort of owe her. I mean, I think she has the goods on him. She’s kept her mouth quiet, she’s stood by him, and, ‘Oh, well, we’ve had our problems but I’m standing by my man.’ I, I, I think he, he, he cannot keep denying her like this.”

“And, so far her expertise in policy … She was elected to nothing, she was appointed to nothing, she was not nominated, she didn’t go through the Senate hearing, and she was put in charge of completely redesigning 1/6^th of the American economy in, I think, a somewhat arrogant way for the entire administration and not just Hillary, but her personality didn’t help.”

“I think it’s just appalling the way she keeps hiding behind the fact that she is a woman. It has absolutely nothing to do with her being a woman.”

“She is constantly raising the fact that the reason she is being attacked is because she is a woman. No, it’s because her ideas are stupid. They were rejected. She assumed too much power.”

[This is the second in a multi-part series providing background and undisclosed details related to the impeachment of Bill Clinton.]

For details about the Machiavellian machinations of the secret cabal against Bill Clinton, see Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory at http://bit.ly/1M2z2O5.

• Case Study #1: Oh, Paula (Jones)
• Case Study # 2: (Linda) TRIPPed Up

Endnotes:

---

[1]              See Ann Coulter is at the Center of ACS: Impeachment at https://bit.ly/3BNYKpY.

[2]              See Chapter 7: The Spawn of Satan Convention in the Beauty of Conservatism at http://bit.ly/2a79k0j.

Ann Coulter is at the Center of ACS: Impeachment

Ann Coulter was part of a secret cabal which she adroitly called “a small, tightly-knit conspiracy.” The conspirators, whom Coulter impishly called “elves,” sought to bring down the Clinton presidency.

That was their sole goal: The demise of Bill Clinton’s presidency.

The conspirators, with Coulter as the crucial connection, were involved in both the Paula Jones lawsuit against Bill Clinton and the disposition of tapes of Monica Lewinsky secretly recorded by Linda Tripp. They sought to destroy Clinton’s presidency, but they also sought to keep their involvement totally secret, for reasons which will become apparent in the course of this series of columns.

Newsweek offers some background:

But it gets one thing wrong: “After Paula Jones filed her lawsuit, Coulter became an unpaid legal advisor on the case, working for Jones’ head lawyer Joseph Cammarata writing legal briefs.”

In reality, Cammarata knew nothing about the involvement of Coulter and the other elves in the Jones case. In fact, the elves actively sought to undermine an out-of-court settlement that Jones desperately desired. And they sought to do so under a cloak of darkness.

Newsweek also reports that George Conway (one of the elves) enlisted his friend, Coulter, into the cabal.

And it was Coulter who personally sabotaged the Jones case by leaking attorney-client privileged information to the press. Why? She said:

“I thought if I leaked the distinguishing characteristic it would show bad faith in negotiations. [Clinton lawyer] Bob Bennett would think Jones had leaked it. Cammarata would know he himself hadn’t leaked it and would get mad at Bennett. It might stall negotiations enough for me to get through to [Jones adviser] Susan Carpenter-McMillan to tell her that I thought settling would hurt Paula, that this would ruin her reputation, and that there were other lawyers working for her.”

As reported by Michael Isikofff, the elves "were terrified that Jones would settle. It was contrary to our purpose of bringing down the President."

Coulter recommended her close friend, Jim Moody, to act as attorney for Linda Tripp. Despite the conflict of interest, Moody gave Tripp’s tape to Coulter. Tripp, who never authorized Coulter to hear those tapes, testified that she heard rumors that Coulter had copied those tapes. According to the IOC, one or more of those tapes may have been tampered with. By whom?

Remember: Coulter boasted that she “got a bestseller out of it.” Indeed, impeachment skyrocketed Coulter to stardom.

Later, Coulter claimed that it was all for Paula Jones’ benefit and not to “get the President!”

[This is the first in a multi-part series providing background and undisclosed details related to the impeachment of Bill Clinton.]

See Case Study #1: Oh, Paula (Jones) in Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory at http://bit.ly/1M2z2O5.

Crazy @AnnCoulter Demands Trump Conviction for Wall

For weeks, Ann Coulter has tweeted that the Senate Republicans create a grand bargain in which they trade conviction of an innocent man for a border wall that the Democrats will never build.

Now, she has published an insane column to that very end!

Once again, Coulter is delusional!

And, yet again, Coulter continues to lie about Trump, who did build a wall.

When will her TDS end?

(Ann truly needs our prayers!)

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged explains why Coulter has become so unhinged!

FreeRepublic Responses

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3933476/posts.

Ann O’ Rexia.

Coulter just does not get it. The purpose of impeaching Trump is to destroy his America first, anti globalist ideology. An open border is critical to the globalist dream of a one world govenment controlled by elites. A border wall is a horror to the globalist. An open border is necessary to destroy the American nation and its culture.The globalist Democrats would never build a wall or do anything to enhance or protect the American nation.

Let’s convict a innocent man, for a crime others committed, which his accusers and judges facilitated through willful inaction, for which they all said worse, for a wall that will not be built. Articles like this are a reminder Ann crossed over to crazy years ago.

AC is just one initial away from AOC.

Can we build a wall around Ann’s house? Good lord, woman, just shut up.

I tired of Ann some years ago. She began to strike me as another one who was about herself and little else. (Ann, have you ever had a Big Mac?)

What a kook. No deals. He needs to be found innocent. Period.

Ms. Coulter’s proposal is equivalent to suggesting, “How about if I offer to let the mob drag my wife out into the streets and rape her and, in exchange, they promise to not molest my daughters?”

[Articles like this are a reminder Ann crossed over to crazy years ago.]

After unrelenting opposition from Republicans, democrats, Federal judges, he got about 750 miles of the wall built. Betrayal??? That woman has lost her mind.

Back in the nineties.we were all focused on the Clinton’s, and she was solid on the issues we were addressing. In the two thousands she started writing a bonehead article every so often. Now it seems she has gone full tilt moron.

Coulter used to be brilliant. Now she sits in the corner babbling nonsense and drooling on herself.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3933396/posts.

Can Coulter use the same Gorilla Glue that the idiot woman put in her hair on her 2 lips? Spare us, you haggard harridan.

Ann has come to the place where she is politically illiterate.

I absolutely loathe this woman. Always have from the moment she first came on the political scene.

Ann is a whore of the lowest degree

What a lunatic!

There is a logical gap in Ann’s reasoning. The obvious thing is the Dems will never fulfill a promise. They, like Lucy, will pull away the football and the Pubbies will fall on their asses. Ann does not need a football to kick. In this case, she has fallen on her ass all by herself.

Ugly says as ugly is

For quite a long time I was delusional as I thought good of this crazy woman.

She is a clown.

.@AnnCoulter’s Grand Bargain

TDS-addled Ann Coulter has repeatedly urged the Senate to convict Donald Trump in exchange for a wall!

Irrational? Yes!

Constitutional? No.

Coulter ignores several very obvious points:

1. Trump is innocent. (But Coulter would convict an innocent man in order to get whatever she wants. Indeed, if the Left can convict Trump, who was president, for a crime he did not commit, then they can convict anyone!
2. Trump is no longer president. Impeachment is designed to oust a president, but Trump is already out of office, so impeachment is nonsensical, except as a means of political and public humiliation. Coulter is obviously in favor of humiliating Trump in this, and any, fashion.
3. Coulter would never get her wall. No matter what Democrats might promise, they would never build a wall. They hate the 450 miles of wall that Trump already built (but which Coulter denies exists)!

Comments on Coulter’s Tweets

Most comments on Coulter’s tweets were highly critical. Here is a sampling:

So you want to convict an innocent man out of what? Vindictiveness? You want the Senate to convict without any facts or proof of wrongdoing? You ant the gov’t to have so much power that all they have to do is point a finger at someone and falsely claim they committed a crime.

Please stop being obsessed with Trump. He’s gone. Focus your energy on stopping amnesty for 20 mil. illegals. Do something good for a change instead of continually being bitter with Trump.

What a wretched thing you are.

You hate our greatest President! You are sick!

Hey Ann how’s that TDS working out for you?

Ann, you are nuts. Biden already stopped your wall. Get over it.

You’re f’ing insane.

How can a lawyer from Cornell who authored 12 books be so ignorant?

Ann, what do you want to convict Trump for? Are you out of your mind? You seem to be pushing this BS that is all Theater. Impossible to convict so move on to another agenda.

Ann, you’re so sad, sounding like that little girl who didn’t get her way.

Offer a conviction in an unconstitutional process for funding for a project that has no majority support in the government? Are you insane?

She thinks an impeachment is fun. What a disgrace. If she needs that for fun, I wonder what life is for her.

Conviction in exchange for a wall? So that your wish can be fulfilled, let’s throw someone under the bus? What about a right to impartial process?

Give up the hatred.

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged shows why Coulter is so demented when it comes to Trump and his MAGA agenda.

.@AnnCoulter Claims Infallibility, Wants to Convict Trump, and Demands a Wall

In an astonishing tweet – just eight words – narcissist Ann Coulter 1) claimed infallibility, 2) called for the Senate to convict Trump on this second bogus impeachment, and 3) demanded a wall in return (quid pro quo).

Coulter hubris is detailed in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged.

As for an impeachment conviction, Coulter, a self-described constitutional attorney, should know better. Public officials cannot be impeached once they are out of office. The purpose of impeachment is to get them out of office.

Coulter’s #TDS continually blinds her to the reality that 1) Trump DID build a wall and that 2) a Democrat-led federal government will NEVER build a wall.

Coulter fans and critics alike lambasted Coulter for her lunacy.

She was called “insane and full of hate,” “blinded by hate” and “useless to conservatives.”

Many rejected Coulter’s attack on Trump, arguing that he was the greatest president of a lifetime, kept his promises, and fought for America!

Many of Coulter’s former fans are aghast at who and what she has become, calling her “pathetic,” “unprincipled,” a “traitor,” “totally irrelevant,” “spiteful,” a “psycho,” and a “buffon.”

People recommended that she get some professional help and medication. One kind soul offered this sage observation: “Bitterness is a choice.” Hebrews 12:15 warns, “looking carefully lest anyone fall short of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up cause trouble, and by this many become defiled.”

For a long time now, former and still current Coulter fans have asked “What happened to you?”

There are many reasons for Ann’s current mental and emotional state. Coulter is unquestionably filled with hubris, arguably insane, and all too often a fool.

Here’s why:

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged provides an in-depth, detailed analysis of why Ann Coulter has gone so berserk!

 

.@AnnCoulter ‘s Worst Column – EVER!

Ann Coulter’s last column during the Trump presidency is arguably her worst column ever!

Jennifer O’Connell even used Coulter’s essay as representative of the bitter Trumper. O’Connell observed (emphasis added):

“As much as I can translate the stream of consciousness, Coulter is unhappy at Trump’s inaction and his family, among other things. It’s hilarious that she wrote an entire book in 2016: In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome! and did her usual, dim-witted fangirling on Fox News throughout the campaign and in the first year of his administration. Must have sold a lot of books.”

“Now Coulter does her best to malign him and everyone in the administration at every turn, whether it’s over the way he handled border issues, Supreme Court nominations, COVID, or the election challenges. There is nothing that Trump can do to make up for her heartbreak. Coulter acts very much like a jilted lover, except she’s the one that did the jilting.”

In a beautifully-expressed but tragically-deranged column, #TDS-addled Never Trumper Ann Coulter vented her eternal enmity for Donald Trump and his family, and she again attacked Israel and Jews.

Orwellian Ministry of Truth

Coulter’s column was filled with malicious mendacity and a potpourri of petty (phony) polemics. Coulter – a lover of Orwell’s 1984 (a book she re-reads every year) – employs many of Big Brother’s techniques in her own work,[1] and, in this column, goes full-bore Ministry of Truth which the former Soviet Union’s Pravda would applaud!

At times, her words were exquisitely-penned, yet irrational and counter-factual (i.e., Ann lied).

Coulter, Anti-Jew, Anti-Israel

Coulter again launched an attack on Jews and Israel.[2]

Trump Incites Riot!

Coulter even joined the chorus of leftists with another big lie, that Trump incited a riot! Notice her derision toward “gullible” Trump supporters who could be goaded “into criminal activity.” She claimed – without proof – that Trump “unleased” a “mob” and was “delighted” to do so!

How to Ratio an Ann Coulter Tweet – I

Coulter’s tweet about her column was ratio’d – big time! People quickly recognized it as fake news, hogwash, and baloney!

How to Ratio an Ann Coulter Tweet – II

Respondents called Coulter a “crazy maniac” who is “a caustic and toxic influence on American culture and politics.

Coulter’s Projection on Full Display

Coulter has been subject to the forces of addictive thinking for decades: denial, rationalization, and projection to name a few.[3]

Coulter is wrong about this one, too. Indeed, Coulter is engaging in a great deal of projection as she is the one who uses and discards people.[4]

Will Coulter ever see herself for who she really is? Or see reality with clarity? Pray that God remove the blinders and scales from her eyes. Otherwise, she will remain a bitter, angry, old woman.

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged provides an in-depth, detailed analysis of Coulter’s worldview and character flaws which have led her to be so wrong in so many areas in which she regards herself as an expert.

Endnotes:

[1]              See Propaganda: Orwell in the Age of Ann Coulter at http://bit.ly/1N7zDji.

[2]              See Case Study: #BlameJewsFirst in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[3]              See the Beauty of Conservatism at http://bit.ly/2a79k0j. See also Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory at http://bit.ly/1M2z2O5.

[4]              See Preface: Coulter Puts God and People in Boxes in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF and Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory at http://bit.ly/1M2z2O5.