.@AnnCoulter Tells 3 Lies in 20 Seconds

Polemicist and perennial fibber Ann Coulter was at it again in Orlando, FL. During her speech, Coulter told three lies in twenty seconds!

Lie Number One: Banished for Supporting Trump!

Coulter:

“I was for him basically since the moment he came down the escalator – for which, by the way, I was banned by Fox News …”

WRONG! Coulter was banned for her continued anti-Semitic commentary.[1]

Lie Number Two: Banished for Attacking Trump!

Coulter:

“then, he became president and wasn’t keeping his promises, um, and then I was banned from Fox News for pointing out that he was not keeping his promises.”

WRONG! Coulter was AGAIN banned for her anti-Semitic commentary!

Coulter’s last appearance on Fox News Channel was actually on December 11, 2018. That night, on the Ingraham Angle, Coulter said (emphasis added):

“I think we’re going to be seeing a lot of these disputes in the Democratic party base because they all hate one another. I mean, you have the Muslims and the Jews and the various exotic sexual groups and the black church ladies with the college queers. The only thing that keeps the Democratic base together is for them to keep focusing on, ‘No, white men are the ones keeping you down. You must hate white men.’ It’s the one thing they all have in common.”

Coulter was banished from Fox News for her anti-Semitic claim that Jews, like the rest of the Democratic Party base, hate white men.

Lie Number Three: Losers Tell the Truth!

Coulter:

You just can’t win telling the truth.”

WRONG!

What an absurd contention!

What a message to give to a college audience!

Coulter’s speech sponsors were the Leadership Institute, Turning Point USA, and The Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT).

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged provides an in-depth, detailed analysis of Coulter’s worldview and character flaws which have led her to be so wrong in so many areas in which she regards herself as an expert.[2]

Endnotes:

[1]      See Case Study: #BlameJewsFirst in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[2]      See Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at http://www.coulterwatch.com/joker.pdf.

.@AnnCoulter Lies For 25 Years About #SCOTUS Cases and Nominees!

With the not unexpected passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, provocateur Ann Coulter is again stridently seeking relevance by trying to become the voice for determining her replacement on the high court.

DON’T TRUST ANN COULTER!

Since RBG’s passing, Coulter has gone on several Twitter rants in support of the only person she considers qualified, the 58-year-old Miguel Estrada. Why? They have been BFFs for 25 years and he shares her views on immigration.

Coulter’s rants include incessant attacks upon the character of Amy Coney Barrett – solely because she is a Catholic (although her being female probably also figures into the equation). Coulter falsely claims that Barrett’s Catholic faith would influence her decisions on the death penalty. The American Spectator, a one-time ally of Coulter’s, also rejects Coulter’s absurd claim.

(Coulter has opposed the Catholic faith, often with vigorous vilification, for decades.)[1]

This isn’t Coulter’s first attempt at subverting the Constitution for political purposes.[2]

(Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged provides a more detailed, in-depth analysis than contained in this post.)

Elián González

The Elián González case became international political theater during the 2000 presidential race. It rekindled the Cold War in miniature. Coulter fed into that political hysteria by telling lies of her own, lies which fit into her own ideological sensibilities. Those lies included turning a Supreme Court decision on its head, claiming it said the exact opposite of what the Court decided.[3]

The heart and core of Coulter’s case for denying Juan Miguel González custody of his own son rested on Coulter’s decades-long belief that fathers have absolutely no rights or responsibilities to their own children except through marriage.

On talk TV – contrary to what the law actually says – Coulter continually insisted that putative fathers have no rights to their children: “The law used to account for these things by saying the father doesn’t have rights to a child unless he’s married to the mother. That’s how a man can claim his heritage and his claims on a child. … That’s how a father gets the right to children, by being married to the mother.”[4]

Coulter reaffirmed – again and again – that only marriage confers custodial rights: “First of all, the idea that a father has rights to a child by donating sperm; No! A father gains rights to a child by being married to the mother. … He has absolutely no rights to the child! Fathers gain rights to children by marrying the mothers.”[5]

The only problem with Coulter’s claims is that they are false. The law has always upheld the biological rights of fathers, irrespective of whether the child is born out-of-wedlock.

Parental Rights

Coulter’s view of parental rights was her principal argument to separate a son from his father, but that core point of her position, that central concept, was an outright lie! To buttress that lie – which she has consistently expressed for over twenty years – Coulter lied about a Supreme Court ruling which any layman can read and see that it reaches the exact opposite conclusion. Coulter wrote:

“Let’s just consider the initial presumption that a father gets custody of his son. The law is indeed clear, at least to this extent: That ‘law’ refers only to legitimate children. … The Supreme Court last weighed in on the legal rights of unwed fathers in 1989 when it cut off all of the father’s rights to his child, including visitation.”[6]

In her essay, Coulter literally reversed the decision of the Court, falsely claiming it denied those custodial rights. Contrary to Coulter’s fiery opinion, the law says otherwise. The Supreme Court, in five cases, upheld the principle of paternity rights for putative fathers. Those cases were all cited in the Supreme Court case cited by Coulter.

In a rather remarkable display of truth twisting, Coulter took this Supreme Court case which affirms the custody rights of natural fathers and declared it the definitive denial of those rights![7]

The father in Coulter’s cited case was not denied parental rights due to illegitimacy but because his claim of fatherhood was filed after the filing deadline. That father had failed to assert his rights within two years of his daughter’s birth. Illegitimacy was never the issue. The Supreme Court has consistently confirmed custodial rights of natural fathers, both in principle and in practice. So, the case Coulter cited says the exact opposite of what Coulter claimed. (This would become a pattern for Coulter.)

“Bald assertions about the very question under dispute,” Coulter once wrote, “is an odd method of argument,”[8] yet that is precisely what Coulter did (and continues to do). According to Coulter, “Everyone is entitled to his own opinion; everyone is not entitled to his own facts.”[9] Apparently Coulter is not above making up her own “facts.”

Strangely (or not, for Ann), Coulter later asserted, “Apparently that’s the way constitutional analysis goes these days. You determine, we’re all Ruth Bader Ginsburg now: Whatever you want the Constitution to say, that’s what it says, miraculously. Well, that has never been me!”[10]

Sorry, Ann, but you are the allegedly “conservative”[11] Ruth Bader Ginsburg!

Birther Coulter Births More Lies

In 2015, Ann Coulter led the charge of those seeking to crush a Cruz candidacy with a lie!

When she thought she could foist Romney on us again in 2016,[12] Coulter began to attack Cruz on his citizenship. With Cruz posing a serious threat to Trump, her new-found soul-mate,[13] Coulter shifted into high gear, stridently claiming Cruz was ineligible to be president.[14]

Erstwhile anti-birther Coulter became the premiere birther attacking Ted Cruz. Why? She wanted to scuttle Cruz’s presidential ambitions and stop his burgeoning support before her own Savior, Trump, lost the nomination.

It’s Really Not About Ted, But All About Ann

Seemingly on emotional steroids, Coulter turned her attack dog persona on Trump’s most formidable Republican foe, all the while professing an “Ah, shucks, I don’t want to do this, but it’s the right thing to do” attitude even has she stuck a shiv in Ted’s side.

Coulter dodged claims that she changed position on Cruz’s eligibility solely to support Trump by asserting she took her current position prior to Trump’s candidacy. That is a red herring.

Coulter wrote: “I said so long before Trump declared for president, back when Cruz was still my guy.”[15] Coulter claimed, “It’s not that I want him not to be a Natural Born Citizen.”[16] Except, Coulter’s later claim is patently false and demonstrably untrue.

In reality, Coulter was obsessed with recruiting Romney for president, so much so that her close friend, Sean Hannity, was aghast at the depth of her obsession. Cruz was becoming an impediment to Coulter’s plans for Romney.

Coulter first sought to disqualify Cruz as a presidential contender to force her idol, Mitt Romney, to run again[17] in 2016. At that time, she wanted Romney – and only Romney![18]

Later, she wanted Trump – and only Trump![19]

Later still, Coulter boasted that she still wanted a Trump-Romney ticket: “In fact, my ideal ticket is Trump-Romney. That’s what I’m really hoping for. That’s the dynamite combo.”[20]

Bob Woodward said, “History is character; behavior is character.”[21] Coulter’s history, and her behavior these past two decades, proves Coulter’s own lack of character.[22] Coulter lied about the Constitution and Supreme Court cases during the 2000 election[23] and she did the same thing during the 2016 election cycle.

Nevertheless, Coulter hypocritically attacked those who correctly interpret the Constitution, lamenting, “It’s kind of annoying me that we are all Ruth Bader Ginsburg now and people interpret the Constitution based on what they want the Constitution to say, not what it does say.”[24]

1608 or 1790; Blood or Soil?

Coulter even emulates Justice Ginsburg, who infamously used contorted and convoluted reasoning to achieve her desired partisan objectives. Andrea Widburg notes, “The worst thing about her decisions, though, was how she misused case authority to create new principles out of whole cloth.  Nothing shows that more than in her determination to bypass our American Constitution and law and look to foreign constitutions, laws, and customs.” Coulter echoes Ginsburg’s approach.

According to Coulter, “In the U.S., also in Great Britain and in France, citizenship is determined by soil. … Congress can write laws for naturalization. That is also in the Constitution. But if Congress has to write a law to make you a citizen, you’re not natural born. … It is determined by a law written by Congress; not by the common law, not by the Constitution. So that is not natural born.”[25]

Except, the law written by Congress (and empowered by the Constitution) establishes who is natural born! In 1790, Congress established citizenship by blood.

Coulter asserted: “The phrase ‘natural born’ is a legal term of art that goes back to Calvin’s Case, in the British Court of Common Pleas, reported in 1608 by Lord Coke. The question before the court was whether Calvin – a Scot – could own land in England, a right permitted only to English subjects.”[26]

The case which Coulter cited – Calvin’s Case (1608) – has to do with English subjects, not citizens. Americans are not subjects. Our Founders took those portions of English common law with which they agreed and modified or dispensed with those portions which were incongruent with the new American constitutional system that they were creating.

Chief Justice Joseph Story wrote, in an 1829 Supreme Court opinion (emphasis added): “The common law of England is not to be taken, in all respects, to be that of America. Our ancestors brought with them its general principles, and claimed it as their birthright; but they brought with them and adopted, only that portion which was applicable to their situation.”

Coulter claimed that a 1608 case in England is the basis for America’s definition of Natural Born Citizen.[27] Consequently, Coulter asserted that the 1790 law enacted by Congress is irrelevant. Does Coulter seriously believe that a 1790 American law enacted by the Founders is nullified by English case law from 1608? Really?

According to the Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities (emphasis added), “In Britain, even before Calvin’s Case, various acts and proclamations provided that a child born out of the territory of England could also be a natural-born subject, as long as the child’s parents owed allegiance to the sovereign of England. This is an example of the jus sanguinis [blood] operating alongside the jus soli [soil]. In the history of both Britain and the United States, the jus sanguinis has always been established by statute, never by judge-made law.

The 1790 statute by Congress, which Coulter dismissed as “irrelevant,” precisely establishes the principle of right of blood which Coulter denies![28]

The Congressional Research Service published its findings on this issue (emphasis added):

“From historical material and case law, it appears that the common understanding of the term ‘natural born’ in England and in the American colonies in the 1700s may have included both the strict common law meaning as born in the territory (jus soli), as well as the statutory laws adopted in England since at least 1350, which included children born abroad to British fathers (jus sanguinis, the law of descent).”

Cleverly, Coulter very subtly suggested that those defending citizenship by blood are nascent Nazis, saying (emphasis added), “The two methods are soil or blood. Curiously, in Germany, it’s, it’s blood.”[29]

Coulter Lied About Yet ANOTHER Supreme Court Case

Coulter wrote: “As the Supreme Court said in Bellei, a case about the citizenship of a man born in Italy to a native-born American mother and an Italian father: ‘It is evident that Congress felt itself possessed of the power to grant citizenship to the foreign born and at the same time to impose qualifications and conditions for that citizenship.’”[30]

Coulter used this case to prove her contention that Cruz is ineligible, when, in fact, it proves the opposite!

As noted in ROGERS v. BELLEI, (1971) (emphasis added):

“Section 301 (a) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1401 (a), defines those persons who ‘shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth.’ Paragraph (7) of 301 (a) includes in that definition a person born abroad ‘of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States’ who has met specified conditions of residence in this country.”

The plan thus adopted by Congress with respect to a person of this classification was to bestow citizenship at birth but to take it away upon the person’s failure to comply with a post-age-14 and pre-age-28 residential requirement. It is this deprival of citizenship, once bestowed, that is under attack here.”

“The very first Congress, at its Second Session, proceeded to implement its power, under the Constitution’s Art. I, 8, cl. 4, to ‘establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization’ by producing the Act of March 26, 1790, 1 Stat. 103. That statute, among other things, stated, ‘And the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.’” [Subsequent statutes extended it to either a citizen mother or citizen father.]

Ted Cruz Is Eligible!

Gary DeMar is perhaps the foremost expert on America’s Founders. DeMar offered a history of originalist thought on Natural Born Citizen and reached this stunning conclusion: “Ted Cruz [is] more of an American than some of the drafters of the Constitution.”

A chagrined Coulter lashed out: “Imagine what nightmare a Cruz presidency would be! This is now the second time Cruz has forced me to research something his supporters were lying about – the last time was on Cruz’s alleged eligibility to be president, despite being born in Canada. (He’s not a ‘natural born citizen,’ but I enjoyed reading all those Supreme Court opinions!)”[31]

Sarah P. Condor-Fisher at Politichicks disagreed: “the People of the United States have the power to recognize a ‘naturalized’ citizen as ‘natural-born’ at any time – by a Congressional declaration of ‘eligibility’ as to the particular person (Art.1, Sec.5), by means of legal interpretation from the Supreme Court – or, by a Constitutional Amendment.”

But for Coulter, this is not just political, it is personal. Seeing herself as the embodiment and perfect representative of America – the “Settler” – she could not brook an interloper gaining the presidency. Moreover, she wanted to be in control of the process and the outcome of the election.

Coulter Defames Supreme Court Nominees

With the retirement of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, conservatives searched for a constitutionalist to replace him. Thomas Hardiman and Raymond Kethledge were floated as a possible replacement. Coulter chose to defame them in order to get her preferred nominee elevated to the highest court in the land.

Again, immigration was the crucial factor in her decision making. Either she doesn’t understand the law as well as she thinks or would have us believe) she does, or she deliberately defamed him (which has been a pattern of behavior she has exhibited for some 25 years).

Raymond Kethledge

Coulter defamed Raymond Kethledge in a column and a series of tweets.

Coulter concluded that Kethledge is an open borders zealot and – without evidence of any kind – that he would betray his oath of office by deliberately misjudging cases to that end.

(Why? Coulter would surely subvert the law, if given the chance, to pursue her own agenda. She has numerous times in the past.)

Coulter presumes Kethledge lacks integrity and would not keep his oath of office because she wouldn’t.

Coulter tweeted:

  • Finding that grand-theft auto is not a theft (AS LONG AS THE CRIMINAL IMMIGRANT GETS TO STAY!) kind of shoots down to the claim that Kethledge is a constitutional textualist.
  • And unlike most ppl taking sides on S. Ct nominees I don’t know any of them personally.* But I can read! *Except Kethledge, which is how I know he’s opposite of Trump on immigration.
  • FALSE! I was a lonely voice in the woods warning you about Judge Roberts. Also opposed Miers — while being attacked for it on Fox News. Now, I’m telling you Kavanaugh is stellar.
  • No commitment to originalism or religious liberty or even overturning Roe will mean a hill of beans in a country that becomes Mexico because of open-borders zealots like Kethledge. See California.
  • That’s a direct quote from the TEXT of the law Kethledge was applying, 8 U.S.C. 1101 – “Definitions”
  • Can anybody figure out what this “text” means? “The term ‘aggravated felony’ means— (G) a theft offense (including receipt of stolen property) or burglary offense for which the term of imprisonment at 5 least one year”

Matthew Downer responded to Coulter:

Kethledge applied the law CORRECTLY.

The definition: “for which the term of imprisonment is at least one year.”

“He was sentenced to a three-year SUSPENDED sentence.”

He “served LESS THAN ONE YEAR in the county jail.”

Thomas Hardiman

Coulter also defamed Thomas Hardiman, again, with the exact same purpose – to get her preferred judge nominated.

As reported by Law and Crime, Coulter attacked “Third Circuit Judge Thomas Hardiman, and accused him of being “subsidized” by liberal philanthropist George Soros.”

Coulter tweeted:

As noted by Law and Crime: “What the heck is up with that? Well, it’s not entirely accurate.” (See article linked above for more details.)

Leonard Leo, Coulter’s close friend and President of the Federalist Society, said (emphasis added), “Tom Hardiman … is very much in the mold of Justice Scalia, well-schooled on the doctrines of originalism and textualism, and he is very experienced.”

Ann Coulter’s #Resistance Movement

Coulter was part of the #Resistance long before it came into being. Just ask Sen. Spencer Abraham, whose policies she subverted while she was working for him on the Senate Judiciary staff in 1995-1996. Coulter boasted of creating plans and giving information to her colleagues to thwart Abraham’s immigration agenda.

Coulter is ever ready to put her thumb on the scales of justice or use a rhetorical fist to achieve her desires. Her end justifies her means.

With every election cycle and every Supreme Court nomination, Coulter becomes #FakeNews.

Over twenty years ago, Coulter said, “I’m perfectly willing to engage in wild speculation and unsubstantiated rumors[32] and her claim is even more true today.

Coulter has become a law unto herself, abandoning principles willy-nilly. She perverts language and subverts the law to undermine the election process, election results, and the will of the people. (See Never Trust Ann Coulter – at Any Age.)
Coulter was Strzok before Strzok became Strzok.

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged provides an in-depth, detailed analysis of Coulter’s worldview and character flaws which have led her to be so wrong in so many areas in which she regards herself as an expert.

 Endnotes:

[1]              See “First, Jews; Now, Catholics?” at http://wp.me/p4jHFp-ah.

[2]              See a series of case studies in Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory.

[3]              For greater details on the González case and Coulter’s perversion of constitutional law, see “Case Study # 4: In the Name of Elián (González),” Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory.

[4]              Ann Coulter, MSNBC, 1/22/97.

[5]              Ann Coulter, MSNBC, 1/25/97.

[6]              Ann Coulter, “The bastardization of justice,” 4/26/00.

[7]              Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 410 (1989).

[8]              Ann Coulter, “Miranda Not a ‘Constitutional Straightjacket,’” 12/15/99.

[9]              Ann Coulter, High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton, Regnery, 1998, pg. 3.

[10]             Ann Coulter, John Gibson Show, Fox News, 1/8/16.

[11]             See Never Trust Ann Coulter – at ANY Age.

[12]             See “Adios, Ann: Only Mitt for Me” at http://wp.me/p4jHFp-70.

[13]             See “Coulter Hates All GOP Candidates But Trump” at http://wp.me/p4jHFp-bj.

[14]             See “Coulter Claims Cruz Ineligible” at http://wp.me/p4jHFp-9j.

[15]             Ann Coulter, “We’re All Ruth Bader Ginsburg Now,” 1/13/16.

[16]             Ann Coulter, Hardball, MSNBC, 1/11/16.

[17]             See “Coulter Stumps for Romney – Again!” at http://wp.me/p4jHFp-4V.

[18]             See “Adios, Ann: Only Mitt for Me” at http://wp.me/p4jHFp-70.

[19]             See “Coulter Hates All GOP Candidates But Trump” at http://wp.me/p4jHFp-bj.

[20]             Ann Coulter, Hardball, MSNBC, 1/11/16.

[21]             Bob Woodward, Fox News Sunday, FNC, 1/10/16.

[22]             See Never Trust Ann Coulter – at ANY Age.

[23]             See “Coulter Lies About Supreme Court Case” at http://wp.me/p4jHFp-bE.

[24]             Ann Coulter, Eric Metaxas Show, Salem Media Group, 1/12/16.

[25]             Ann Coulter, John Gibson Show, Fox News, 1/8/16.

[26]             Ann Coulter, “We’re All Ruth Bader Ginsburg Now,” 1/13/16.

[27]             Ann Coulter, Eric Metaxas Show, Salem Media Group, 1/12/16.

[28]             See Case Study: Natural Born Citizens in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[29]             Ann Coulter, John Gibson Show, Fox News, 1/8/16.

[30]             Ann Coulter, “We’re All Ruth Bader Ginsburg Now,” 1/13/16.

[31]             Ann Coulter, “Ted Cruz: Tracy Flick With a D*CK,” 4/13/16.

[32]             Ann Coulter, MSNBC, 11/9/96.

.@AnnCoulter Joins @TheAtlantic and #LincolnProject to Smear Donald Trump

Fresh off a ten-day Twitter suspension, #TDS-addled Ann Coulter again trashed President Trump, suggesting he has broken his promises regarding the military and ending pointless wars.

Shockingly, Coulter’s assertions feed in to the bogus hit piece against Trump by The Atlantic and suggests she is in league with the Lincoln Project to bring down the Trump presidency.

Anyone with a brain can see that Trump has been the first president in many decades to refrain from starting new wars and ending old ones. Indeed, her churlish criticism of Trump is at odds with Trump’s nomination for a well-earned Nobel Peace Prize.

Nothing satisfies Ann Coulter.

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged provides an in-depth, detailed analysis of Coulter’s worldview and character flaws which have led her to be so wrong in so many areas in which she regards herself as an expert.[1]

Endnotes:

[1]      See Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at http://www.coulterwatch.com/joker.pdf.

.@AnnCoulter: “Woe Is Me!”

What does Ann Coulter fear most? Apparently, a tombstone with an epitaph reading: “ANN COULTER WAS KILLED BY A HURRICANE WITH AN UNPRONOUNCEABLE FOREIGN NAME.”

Hurricane Isaias gave the world a glimpse into polemicist Ann Coulter’s soul (or lack thereof).

Coulter tweeted:

For decades, Coulter has mocked the victims of natural disasters such as hurricanes.[1]

When Hurricane Isaias looked like it was going to descend upon her home in West Palm Beach, Florida, Coulter almost screamed, “Woe is me!

Coulter’s surprising point of attack was to criticize the name of the hurricane, not the danger it augured. “Do you HAVE to be f–ing politically correct, with an unpronounceable name, when people are worried about their homes being destroyed?”

Amazing! In her panic (yes, Ann suffers from panic attacks),[2] Coulter lashed out at the foreignness of its name.[3] Indeed, Coulter similarly lashed out at Delta Airlines when she perceived a foreigner “stealing” her seat (a metaphor for illegal aliens invading America).[4]

Perhaps Coulter was unaware that Isaias is Spanish for Isaiah (itself a difficult name to spell), a biblical (or, Jewish, if you prefer) name of a prophet of God, and the title of a book inspired by her Creator.

Strikingly, Isaiah had his own “Woe is me!” moment when he was directly confronted by God.

“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty” (Isa. 6:5).

It was only after Isaiah repented in humility and turned to God that God could perform a mighty work through him.

Where and when will Ann have her spiritual “Woe is me!” moment?

Or will Coulter’s arrogance and hubris forever blind her to her true spiritual state and need for repentance to the One in whose image she was created?[5]

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged provides an in-depth, detailed analysis of Coulter’s worldview and character flaws which have led her to be so wrong in so many areas in which she regards herself as an expert.[6]

Endnotes:

[1]              See Chapter 5: Humor as Weapon, Defense Mechanism, and Outright Fun in  Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at http://www.coulterwatch.com/joker.pdf.

[2]              See Case Study: #CowardlyCoulter in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at http://www.coulterwatch.com/joker.pdf.

[3]              See Case Study: WASP America in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at http://www.coulterwatch.com/joker.pdf.

[4]              See Case Study: Delta Ambushed in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at http://www.coulterwatch.com/joker.pdf.

[5]              See Character Study: Pride, Humility, and Wisdom in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at http://www.coulterwatch.com/joker.pdf.

[6]              See Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at http://www.coulterwatch.com/joker.pdf.

Is @AnnCoulter a Socialist?

It would seem so. For years now, Coulter has been progressively adopting leftist dogmas, such as a wealth tax, “confiscatory taxes” (to specifically target political foes), and reparations.

Sounding evermore like @AOC,[1] Coulter even toyed with the idea of voting and campaigning for Bernie Sanders.

Coulter has echoed AOC’s call for a wealth tax, one which she would target against her political foes. She has called for “confiscatory taxes” to be levied upon hedge fund managers. And she has toyed with voting for – and campaigning for – Bernie Sanders!

Coulter has frequently spoken of the “benefits of local fascism,” called for suppression of liberal speech, sought to rescind the 19th Amendment (giving women the right to vote), and called for poll taxes and literacy tests for voting.

Opposes Tax Cuts

In August 2017, a Coulter Twitter rant of at least 11 tweets disparaged Trump’s tax cut proposal. One headline: “Ann Coulter is losing her mind over Trump’s tax speech.”

In one tweet she declared, “This is the worst, most tone-deaf speech @realDonaldTrump has ever given. Jeb! had better ideas.” (Coulter’s fallback position is to call Trump worse than #Jeb! – a candidate she deplored.)

Favors Reparations

Coulter tweeted: “Tariq: I like #ADOS, but I think it should be #DOAS – Descendants of American slaves. Not Haitian slaves, not Moroccan slaves, etc.”

Again, Coulter tweeted: “It’s not “#ADOS,” it’s “#DOAS” – descendants of AMERICAN slaves, or for simplicity “Foundational Black Americans.”

Wealth Tax

Coulter has joined @AOC in demanding a wealth tax!

Coulter tweeted: “Ocasio-Cortez wants a 70-80% income tax on the rich. I agree! Start with the Koch Bros. — and also make it WEALTH tax.”

Coulter tweeted: “I can’t wait for the 70-80% tax on the rich. MAKE SURE IT’S A WEALTH TAX, LIBERALS!”

Coulter tweeted: “We need confiscatory taxes on hedge fund & P.E. managers.”

Favors Bernie Sanders!

Coulter declared, “If he went back to that position, I’d vote for [Bernie Sanders]. I might work for him.”

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged provides an in-depth, detailed analysis of Coulter’s worldview and character flaws which have led her to be so wrong in so many areas in which she regards herself as an expert.[2]

Endnotes:

[1]              See Case Study: #AnnOcasioCoulter in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF.

[2]               See Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at http://www.coulterwatch.com/joker.pdf.

Coulter’s Curse: Her Endorsement is the Kiss of Death

Erstwhile conservative celebrity Ann Coulter – who has admitted more than once that she is bad at predictions – demands that Americans heed her choice for political candidates ranging from the state assembly, to governors and senators, and, especially, presidential candidates.[i]

Coulter’s track record is abysmal.

One could arguably contend that an Ann Coulter endorsement is the kiss of death!

Jeff Sessions in 2020

In 2020, Coulter endorsed and endlessly supported Jeff Sessions to regain his former senate seat. For four years, Coulter relentlessly touted Sessions as the best member of the Trump administration and the best (perhaps only) savior of America.

Sessions lost in a crushing landslide defeat (61% to 39%). Coulter’s full-throated support for Sessions went down in flames.

True Americans will never forget that Sessions abdicated his responsibilities as U.S. Attorney General by failing to drain the swamp. Moreover, his foolish and cowardly recusal needlessly allowed the #DeepStateCoup and #RussiaHoax to continue for three more years, thus embedding a false narrative into the American consciousness, lending a foundational framework for the #UkraineHoax and #FakeImpeachment, and crippling the Trump administration from fully fulfilling its MAGA agenda.

Had Sessions done his job properly and been the warrior for truth and justice we all expected, Trump would have undoubtably been even more successful than he has been in pursuing his America First agenda, including on immigration, the one issue Coulter is most passionate about.

But instead of blaming Sessions, she adoringly praises him and bitterly attacks Trump! #TDS![ii]

Kris Kobach in 2018 and 2020

Coulter, laser-focused on immigration, vigorously campaigned for Kris Kobach for Kansas governor. Kobach, a bureaucrat and policy wonk, was defeated 48% to 43%. She endorsed and campaigned for him in vain. Apparently, the citizens of Kansas did not view him as a leader.

Coulter made the exact same mistake in 2020, endorsing and vigorously promoting Kobach for Kansas senator in a state which had previously rejected him for governor. Kobach was handily defeated (39% to 26%). (Some would say that qualifies as a landslide.)

There was a dumbfounded silence on Coulter’s Twitter feed following Kobach’s debacle. Nary a word. One person sarcastically tweeted that Coulter’s endorsement “carried no weight.”

Strikingly, Coulter’s brazen ego thought that Kansans would forgive and forget her snarky tweet two years earlier: “Kansas is dead to me.” Instead, Kansans (wisely) don’t trust Coulter and they decisively rejected her endorsement.

Paul Nehlen in 2016

In 2016, Coulter endorsed and campaigned for Paul Nehlen for his bid for a Wisconsin congressional seat. Nehlen garnered an abysmal landslide defeat (84% to 16%).[iii]

Perhaps Wisconsinites didn’t like two Alt-Right leaders sharing a platform together.[iv]

Mitt Romney in 2012 and 2016

Who can forget Coulter’s lavish worship of Mitt Romney for president in 2012 and her insistence that Romney was the ideal and perfect candidate? Romney was crushed (electoral votes 332 to 206).

Even so, Coulter still wanted him to run in 2016![v]

Even during Trump’s rise to victory, Coulter proposed a Trump-Romney ticket and assured the whole of America that she could broker a rapprochement between the two.

Utter nonsense!

To this day – despite Trump’s endorsement of Romney for the senate in Utah – Romney has consistently back-stabbed Trump whenever and wherever possible (very much like Coulter).

Coulter’s hubris compels her to think she can accomplish anything, distorts her perceptions of the world and reality, and clouds her judgment.

Jeffers Dodge in 2006

Long before that, in 2006, Coulter endorsed and campaigned for her friend, Jeffers Dodge, for California state assembly. Dodge lost in another abysmal landslide defeat (85% to 15%).

[NOTE: These are just some highlights of Coulter’s infamous endorsements which backfired. Perhaps Ann is not the king-maker that she would have us to believe.[vi]]

Ann Coulter in 2000

Coulter’s own political ambitions were thwarted two decades ago. Talk about utter humiliation!

From 1999-2000, Coulter desperately sought to get on the ballot – for any party – to oppose her own Republican congressman (Chris Shays) in an act of revenge for his vote against the impeachment of Bill Clinton. The Republican Party was not interested given their satisfaction with Shay’s performance.[vii]

Coulter then groveled before the Libertarian Party, believing her celebrity status would draw votes away from Shays, but the Libertarians wanted a true Libertarian who would endorse the Libertarian candidate for president.

Coulter has hated libertarians ever since.

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged provides an in-depth, detailed analysis of Coulter’s worldview and character flaws which have led her to be so wrong in so many areas in which she regards herself as an expert.[viii]

Endnotes:

[i]               See Chapter 2: Presidential Follies in Never Trust Ann Coulter – at ANY Age at http://bit.ly/2a6Ns4w.

[ii]              See Apocalyptic @AnnCoulter Screams Doomsday in Midst of American Renaissance at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-pa.

[iii]             See “Stunning Coulter-Nehlen Defeat” at http://wp.me/p4jHFp-fm.

[iv]             See Case Study: Alt-Right in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://bit.ly/2TttHtF. See also #NeverTrump: Coulter’s Alt-Right Utopia at http://amzn.to/2fzA9Mr.

[v]              See Case Study # 6: Romney v. Everyone Else in Propaganda: Orwell in the Age of Ann Coulter at http://bit.ly/1N7zDji.

[vi]             See Preface in #NeverTrump: Coulter’s Alt-Right Utopia at http://amzn.to/2fzA9Mr.

[vii]            See Case Study # 3: Coulter for Congress in Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory at http://bit.ly/1M2z2O5. See also Case Study: Coulter 2020 in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at http://www.coulterwatch.com/joker.pdf..

[viii]           See Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at http://www.coulterwatch.com/joker.pdf.

CRUSHING Defeat For @JeffSessions AND @AnnCoulter

Jeff Sessions was trounced by his rival for an Alabama senate seat, despite years of endorsements and support by anti-Trump “conservative” Ann Coulter.

Indeed, over the past few weeks, Coulter’s tweeter rants against Trump and for Sessions proved futile!
Ironically, Coulter blames Trump and neither Sessions nor herself for their defeat!
What do the people of Alabama know that bi-coastal elite and New England carpetbagger Coulter does not know?
Why was Coulter so very wrong about Sessions and why does she continue to be so obtuse about President Trump? #TDS!
Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged provides an in-depth, detailed analysis of Coulter’s worldview and character flaws which have led her to be so wrong in so many areas in which she regards herself as an expert.

.@AnnCoulter is NOT an American Patriot

For four years now, Ann Coulter has – in word and in deed – rejected the tenets of her last two books: in Trump, Coulter does not trust; Coulter has become part of the resistance which she claimed was futile.

This proved true over the Fourth of July weekend.

Coulter did not tweet one single time about Trump’s fantastically patriotic and positive speech, nor did she rebut leftist claims that it was “dark and divisive.” Instead, Coulter continued her attack on Trump, his family, and his policies.

In this definitive battle between the forces of darkness and of the light, between civilization on the one hand and chaos leading to tyranny on the other, Ann Coulter has more often than not sided with America’s enemies against America, America’s roots, and America’s standard-bearer for American Civilization – Donald Trump.

Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged provides an in-depth, detailed analysis of Coulter’s worldview and character flaws which have led her to be so wrong in so many areas in which she regards herself as an expert.

.@AnnCoulter Crack-Up

The end of May 2020 saw #WackyNutJob Ann Coulter going even more berserk than ever!

Coulter had a Twitter meltdown on May 24th,[1] an interview meltdown on May 26th,[2] and another Twitter meltdown on May 28th.

In that May 28th meltdown, Coulter made asinine assertions, proffered fabricated “facts,” employed hysterical hyperbole, and irrationally impugned both the motives and agenda of Trump and his administration.

On May 28, 2020, Coulter:

  • claimed that Trump has done nothing for his supporters, calling him a “big betrayer.”
  • accused Trump of narcissism in going after Twitter for fact-checking him.
  • asserted, once again, that Trump is not building a wall.
  • repeatedly blamed Trump for riots in Minneapolis, calling it “Trump’s America.”
  • “A violent mob is about to burn down a Minneapolis police precinct in Trump’s America.”
  • “Even a senile dementia patient sitting in his basement with a mask on would send in the National Guard to stop this sickness.”
  • claimed Trump’s executive order on big tech companies is all bark and no bite.
  • sarcastically feigned surprise that Trump had (allegedly) broken a campaign promise.
  • berated (again) Trump for opposing her favorite candidate, Jeff Sessions, commending Sessions in multiple tweets.
  • called for someone else to run for president in place of Trump.
  • objected to Trumps tweets about Joe Scarborough.

We are witnessing a Coulter crack-up (or breakdown, if you prefer) because reality, facts, and truth do not align with the world according to Ann Coulter.

Coulter has become unmoored from any fixed principles apart from her own ego and desire to set America’s agenda. (Who made Coulter president?)

Coulter’s obsession with a wall blinds her to reality,[3] to the far bigger strategic vision that President Trump has been pursuing to Make America Great Again. Instead, all Coulter wants is to Make Coulter Great Again!

Consequently, Coulter has become the Left’s not-so-secret weapon again Trump and America First![4]

Prior to the coronavirus pandemic, Coulter was proclaiming an apocalypse in the very midst of an American Renaissance![5]

Since then, Coulter has become wackier than ever![6]

Coulter’s ever-increasing wackiness is recounted in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged, which provides an in-depth, detailed and holistic exposé of Ann Coulter.

Endnotes:

[1]              See @AnnCoulter’s Memorial Day Madness at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-sh.

[2]              See @AnnCoulter’s Unhinged Meltdowns over Trump! at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-sq.

[3]              See @AnnCoulter – Walled Off … From Reality! at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-nr.

[4]              See @AnnCoulter, the Left’s Secret Weapon Against America at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-oh.

[5]              See Apocalyptic @AnnCoulter Screams Doomsday in Midst of American Renaissance at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-pa.

[6]              See @AnnCoulter – Wackier Than Ever at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-qO.

Is @AnnCoulter Becoming … Senile?

Is Ann Coulter becoming senile?

One could reasonably reach that conclusion given her confusion on so many issues and her continuing to maintain that certain things are true when they demonstrably are not (e.g., Trump hasn’t kept any of his promises;[1] Trump isn’t building a wall;[2] and her recent unhinged meltdowns over Trump).[3]

Coulter Mocks Dementia and Senility

Consider two of Coulter’s recent tweets:

Coulter is a very clever person and loves a good joke. However, it is one thing to point out that Sleepy Joe Biden appears to be have a rapidly declining cognitive ability, but it is quite something else to joke about it and make light of it.

Coulter loves to go for the jugular, as one Coulter profiler noted some two decades ago. She also loves to target a foe’s greatest weakness and use scurrilous name-calling (such as frequently using the R-Word!)[4]. This, at best, highlights Coulter’s inhumanity toward her fellow human beings.

Could it also portend the unset of senility?

Coulter’s Family History of Dementia

Is Ann Coulter becoming senile? Has she forgotten the anguish her own family experienced for years while her father was suffering from dementia before his death?[5]

Coulter’s poignant eulogy for Father explained that “Lewy bodies dementia prevented him from saying much at all” and that “Treason was dedicated to him, the last book of mine he was able to read.” (Treason was published in 2003; Father died in 2008.)

Coulter also wrote: “To Mother’s lifelong consternation – until he had dementia and she could get him back by smothering him with hugs and kisses – Father wasn’t demonstrative.”

Is Ann Coulter senile? Or just callous and cold-hearted?

Coulter’s ever-increasing wackiness is recounted in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged, which provides an in-depth, detailed and holistic exposé of Ann Coulter.

Endnotes:

[1]              See Apocalyptic @AnnCoulter Screams Doomsday in Midst of American Renaissance at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-pa.

[2]              See @AnnCoulter – Walled Off … From Reality! at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-nr.

[3]              See @AnnCoulter’s Unhinged Meltdowns over Trump! at https://wp.me/p4jHFp-sq.

[4]              See Case Study: Retarded Rhetoric and Rape Fantasies in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at https://tinyurl.com/yx2lhcst.

[5]              See “RIP John V. Coulter” at http://wp.me/p4jHFp-kj.