Shallow @AnnCoulter Makes Massive Blunders!

In a scant five hours, “journalist” Ann Coulter made two massive blunders.

Coulter is often very shallow, with little depth. She is superficial, not substantive. She often makes snap judgments and reaches simplistic conclusions based on a superficial look. Remember: Coulter famously said that she could solve America’s immigration crisis using Tinder!

Coulter’s first blunder was a retweet about the Bail Project nonprofit. Coulter falsely claims,

“It’s almost all women in that picture. Men need to marry women to keep them out of politics.”

Problem number one: There are at least 15 men in that photo.

Problem number two: Two of Coulter’s political heroines are Margaret Thatcher and Phyllis Schlafly, both of whom were political leaders and married mothers. In fact, Coulter wrote a lengthy obituary for Schlafly. (Perhaps Ann simply forgot. The aging process will do that.)

Coulter is merely perpetuating her two-plus-decades long jihad against the 19th Amendment and assault on women in general (“girl” cops, “girl” soldiers) and liberal women in particular (whom she regularly depicts as fat, ugly, and stupid).

Coulter’s second blunder was a retweet of a New York Times article (Zelensky Answers Hamlet) in which she, again, erroneously claims,

“It’s disturbing to see how many Americans can be easily whipped into a frenzy or hate or adoration.”

The problem: The photo depicts British Parliament, where the events of the story take place.

Coulter was once a Congressional aide, but now she mistakes Parliament for Congress?

I remember when Coulter confused the American and Confederate flags!

Ann Coulter is increasingly having difficulty in differentiating between fact and fiction, largely due to her Trump Derangement Syndrome and her insistence that everyone who disagrees with her about anything is wrong or evil.

Why is Ann Coulter, who prides herself on doing her own research, so derelict in discerning the facts which are so blatantly self-evident in the photos and articles she retweets? That she actually does not read beforehand what she tweets about is becoming more obvious by the day.

What are the reasons for Coulter’s dysfunctional behavior and shoddy journalism?

See Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at for greater insight.


.@AnnCoulter Rejects Ukraine’s Heroism and Accepts Putin’s War Crimes

Ardent isolationist Ann Coulter resurrects the spirit of Charles Lindbergh, who was an apologist for Hitler and shared many of his views on the preservation of the white race.

If Lindbergh was pro-Hitler, Coulter is pro-Putin.

Replying to a tweet noting the massive number (almost a million at that time) of Ukrainian refugees fleeing to Poland, Coulter tweeted:

“Yeah, but they get Ukrainians. We get the Tsarnaev brothers, the Pulse nightclub shooter, the illegal who just murdered all his kids in CA, and a million Mexican meth and fentanyl dealers.”

(Don’t expect any compassion or empathy from Ann.)

Coulter had previously dismissed Putin with this tweet:

“I have no idea what sanctions against Putin will work at this late date, but I suggest we start with mask mandates, quarantines, and mandatory lockdowns.”

Coulter even suggested that Putin’s War is a false flag operation:

“Have you noticed a lot of the Ukraine fire footage on TV looks suspiciously like stock shots from Kenosha or Seattle?”

In the first of two back-to-back columns on Ukraine, Coulter demanded: “Stop Talking About Ukraine, Republicans!” She wrote:

“Whenever you see any media talking about Ukraine, your Pavlovian response should be, Oh, I see. They don’t want me to think about immigration or crime.”

Continuing that thought, Coulter stated:

“This year, the worshipful reverence for Ukraine’s borders has the added bonus of blocking Americans from thinking about immigration and crime.”

Coulter continued:

“In our ruling class’s ideal country, there will be nothing but defense contractors, Black Lives Matter activists and Latin American gardeners.”

Coulter even blamed Trump for Putin’s war.

Coulter also contends:

“Republicans ought to be talking their heads off about the unprecedented crisis at our border, Afghan ‘refugees’ raping little kids in our country, illegal aliens hauling meth and fentanyl into our country, rampant shoplifting, carjacking and assaults destroying neighborhoods in our country.”

Coulter concluded her first column with dripping sarcasm:

“GOP 2022 Contract With America: ‘Putin’s like Hitler.’”

In reality, Putin IS like Hitler. Both committed atrocious war crimes and were responsible for massive refugee crises.

Coulter said the 24/7 media coverage of the Russian-Ukrainian War is a diversion designed to help Biden and Democrat Party prospects in the upcoming election. This is conspiracy theory nonsense. Wars always get intense media coverage, especially one as dramatic and impactful as Putin’s War.

American Thinker agrees:

“And it’s silly to think that the war has distracted Americans from the country’s festering domestic woes.  Sillier still is the idea that the Russia-Ukraine conflict is Biden’s means of offloading the troubles he’s created.  Biden and his hapless White House handlers would surely love to pin Biden’s across-the-board failures on a distant war.  But a majority of Americans aren’t suckers.”

“Moreover, importantly, all politics are local and personal.  Middle- and working-class Americans are seeing their paychecks shrink daily as their family budgets continue to stretch.  That’s happened for many months now.”

Coulter’s opening paragraph in her second column managed to diminish the import of the Russian-Ukrainian War and … attack Jared Kushner!

“As World War III looms in Europe, we must put narrow partisan differences aside and tap the brain power of the greatest minds among us. It is time for the Biden White House to call upon … Jared!”

(Coulter always blames Jews.[1] By the way, the heroic and Churchillian Zelensky is Jewish.)

Coulter recounted U.S. policy vis-à-vis Russia from Obama to Biden and remarkably gave credence to the Russia Hoax, writing,

“(This was absolutely NOT an insane conspiracy theory supported by zero evidence.)”

Coulter’s conclusion?

“Unlike the experts and journalists whose deep study has led them to a sophisticated take on Russia (that flips back and forth with the politics of the moment), my position on Russia has been as unchanged as the Rock of Gibraltar, at least since the end of the Cold War. Coincidentally, it is exactly the same as my position on Taiwan, Haiti, Uganda and North Korea.”

“It is this: Tens of millions of illegals are pouring across our border and must be stopped.”

(Remember, Coulter claims that ALL immigrants are bad!)

In other words, let the whole world go to hell in a hand basket and let refugees die the deaths they deserve for not being Americans.

War crimes are OK for Coulter.

At least Lindbergh was appalled at what he saw in Nazi death camps!

How can Coulter be so shockingly wrong? See Case Study: From Jingoist to Pacifist in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at


[1]              See Case Study: #BlameJewsFirst in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at

Ann Coulter’s Hot Takes on Rittenhouse Jury!

Ann Coulter’s conflicting how takes on the Rittenhouse jury expose how impatient and fickle she is.

One day they are the stupidest people on the planet; the next day they are the bravest!

Why does Coulter so often behave so erratically and so irrationally?

See Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at

Ann Coulter Hits Home Run on Kyle Rittenhouse Trial

In a superb column (her second in two weeks), Ann Coulter gave a journalistic middle finger to the Fake News Media, race hustlers, and riot revelers who have descended on Kenosha, WI, to attack Kyle Rittenhouse, law and order, the second amendment, and civilization itself.

The Left, bent on the total transformation of America into a progressive utopia, is using every corrupt thing it can muster to aid its cause, from Soviet-style show trials to Pravda-like propaganda to threats, intimidation, doxxing, and mob rule.

Enter Ann Coulter, with a game-changing grand-slam home run in her column (11/17/21), in which she wrote that the prosecutor charged Rittenhouse …

“for shooting three psychopathic criminals who were attacking him at the BLM/antifa riots in Kenosha last year.”

Coulter added:

“In his closing argument, Binger decided to ignore his loser case and argue an entirely different case, for which no evidence had been adduced.”

“according to Binger, the collection of mental patients, domestic violence offenders and pedophiles attacking Rittenhouse were ‘heroes,’ just trying to stop the ‘active shooter’!”

While demonizing Rittenhouse, Binger lionized the depraved:

“But it’s pretty sleazy for a prosecutor to rely on the jurors’ ignorance of excluded evidence to paint a picture he knows to be false of the men who attacked the defendant and their pure-as-snow motives.”

“This is the prosecutor calling stranglers, burglars and elderly abusers ‘heroes’!”

“The only monster in this sea of angels, according to Binger, was Rittenhouse.”

Coulter’s conclusion is spot on!

“Kyle Rittenhouse is on trial so that no one will dare stand in the way of the left’s shock troops ever again.”

For more of Coulter’s best, see @AnnCoulter at Her Best at

Ann Coulter Hates Princess Diana for What Coulter Is Not

WASP Ann Coulter, an avowed Anglophile, hates Princess Diana and has done so for over two decades. Why? Because Diana was everything Ann is not.

At her height, the world adored Diana; at Ann’s greatest notoriety, the world despised Coulter.

Surprisingly, Ann and Diana shared much in common. Both moved in elite circles; both suffered from insecurity and eating disorders; and both were, in different degrees, narcissists.

Where they differed is that Diana was open about her faults, whereas Ann “despised weakness of any kind.” Diana gave selfless love, whereas Ann was, and remains, a selfish opportunist.

People saw the courage and compassion shine through Diana’s faults; they see the flaws and dysfunctions beneath Ann’s professed virtues.

For more details, see Chapter 2: The Cuckolding of Conscience in the Beauty of Conservatism at

Ann Coulter Despises the People’s Princess – Diana

Polemicist Ann Coulter hated Princess Diana in the 1990s and denounced her just days after her death.

Coulter’s hatred for Diana had not dissipated two decades later.

Ironically, Coulter herself has been credibly accused of being an “anorexic, bulimic, narcissist.”

The truth must hurt.

See Chapter 8: The Lost Art of the Eulogy: It’s All About ME! in Vanity: Ann Coulter’s Quest for Glory at

Ann Coulter Trashed Princess Diana Just Days After Her Death!

Ann Coulter passionately hated Princess Diana. She chose to trash the People’s Princess just days after her tragic death as the world grieved.

Why did Coulter trash Diana? For many reasons. Coulter viewed Diana as deficient as a human being because of her faults. Coulter couldn’t understand why so many people loved Diana. Coulter was jealous of the attention Diana got that she thought she herself deserved.

And Coulter could not discern Diana’s love and courage.

What did Coulter say about Diana?

It’s one thing to say, “Look, she had a difficult situation, it wasn’t her fault that Prince Charles walked out on her, and it wasn’t her fault that the paparazzi were following her around and catching her sleeping with all these useless playboys.” But you can’t say “We forgive her that” and “She’s a good mother.” You can’t have it both ways! What? You can’t! You’re saying you can be a round heel and a good mother? Her children knew she’s sleeping with all these men. That just seems to me, it’s the definition of “not a good mother.” … And it was well known the paparazzi were taking photos of her. She couldn’t hold back so the children wouldn’t know that she’s having premarital sex with some guy who doesn’t pay his debts to the 21 Club in New York?

Everyone’s incredibly mean to her. She’s the only good true person in her own version of her life and, maybe there were a lot of bad things that happened to her, but, boy is she paying them back now.”

Everyone! … It’s so unbelievable and so self-serving. She’s the only one who’s good and pure here. I mean, maybe she did have a tough life, but, boy, she’s getting her revenge: the Queen, her mother, her step-mother. She’s the only one who’s hurt and wounded.”

For details, see Chapter 2: The Cuckolding of Conscience in the Beauty of Conservatism at

Ann Coulter Still Blind; Can’t See Trump’s Wall!

Polemicist Ann Coulter again trashed Donald Trump, falsely claiming that he never built a wall.

Coulter appeared on Andrew Sullivan’s Dishcast and lied:

“I grew up in New Canaan and I’ve been reading Page Six since I was a little kid. I was well familiar with what a narcissistic, ridiculous, tacky, vulgar, arriviste this guy was. That I knew about. The one thing I underestimated, in fact, did not see at all is, I had no idea how abjectly stupid the man is. In my defense, a lot of journalists would ask me during 2016, when I was promoting In Trump We Trust, they’d say, ‘Oh he’s not really going to build the wall’ and I’d laugh at them. I’d laugh and say, ‘No the one thing he’s got to do is build the wall. I just couldn’t imagine anyone could be so stupid to run on one thing.”

Coulter’s historical revisionism claims Trump ran on only one thing (the wall) and ignores everything else he ran on which were all components of America First. Trump accomplished an enormous amount of his promised MAGA agenda, yet Coulter bashes Trump and not Biden, who is destroying America every hour of every day.


See Case Study: Walled Off! in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at

Coulter Channels Her Inner Racist

In the aftermath of Glenn Youngkin’s stunning upset victory for Virginia governor, Alt-Rght queen Ann Coulter once again reaffirmed that only white votes matter!

Alt-Right Queen Ann Coulter Channels Her Inner Racist

Coulter has, for decades, demanded that Republicans “court the white vote,” the only vote that matters to Coulter.

Strangely, Coulter attributes Youngkin’s success to racial politics rather than policy positions and ferocious support from outraged parents across the political and racial spectrum. Moreover, she equates Trump’s “loss” in 2020 to losing white votes (even though he got 19 million more votes!).

Coulter has her own mirror-image version of Critical Race Theory and it is called White Supremacy. She cannot views Americans as simply … Americans. Rather, she has a deep-seated need to place people into categories!

White supremacy is Ann Coulter’s thing and she can’t stop herself.

Here’s why: See Case Study: Alt-Right in Joker: Ann Coulter Unplugged at